Re: [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di"
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:49:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:42 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote: > > The first two patches implement the pr_cont variants of the formatting > > functions. The rest convert the existing users to pr_cont and seq > > functions subsystem-by-subsystem. It'd be the easiest to route all > > through -mm but the conversion patches can go through individual > > subsystem trees afterwards if necessary. > > But you're working on other code which will depend on this? If so > perhaps these should be held in your tree. Yeah, that works too. I was still targeting 3.19 window and some of the conversion patches were conflicting, so thought it'd be easier through -mm. Given that the changes aren't that invasive, I think it'd be still a good idea to merge the workqueue debugging during this merge window as it gives a lot more visibility into tricky issues. Once it's agreed on, I'll try to route the feature patches (the first two from this series + actual workqueue changes) early through wq branch. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di"
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:42 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote: > 0001-bitmap-restructure-bitmap_sn-list-printf.patch > 0002-bitmap-cpumask-nodemask-implement-pr_cont-variants-o.patch > 0003-mips-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functi.patch > 0004-powerpc-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-fun.patch > 0005-tile-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functi.patch > 0006-x86-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functio.patch > 0007-xtensa-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-func.patch > 0008-cpuset-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-func.patch > 0009-rcu-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functio.patch > 0010-sched-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-funct.patch > 0011-timer-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-funct.patch > 0012-percpu-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-func.patch > > The first two patches implement the pr_cont variants of the formatting > functions. The rest convert the existing users to pr_cont and seq > functions subsystem-by-subsystem. It'd be the easiest to route all > through -mm but the conversion patches can go through individual > subsystem trees afterwards if necessary. But you're working on other code which will depend on this? If so perhaps these should be held in your tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:42 -0500 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote: 0001-bitmap-restructure-bitmap_sn-list-printf.patch 0002-bitmap-cpumask-nodemask-implement-pr_cont-variants-o.patch 0003-mips-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functi.patch 0004-powerpc-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-fun.patch 0005-tile-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functi.patch 0006-x86-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functio.patch 0007-xtensa-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-func.patch 0008-cpuset-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-func.patch 0009-rcu-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-functio.patch 0010-sched-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-funct.patch 0011-timer-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-funct.patch 0012-percpu-use-cpu-node-mask-pr_cont-and-seq-output-func.patch The first two patches implement the pr_cont variants of the formatting functions. The rest convert the existing users to pr_cont and seq functions subsystem-by-subsystem. It'd be the easiest to route all through -mm but the conversion patches can go through individual subsystem trees afterwards if necessary. But you're working on other code which will depend on this? If so perhaps these should be held in your tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:49:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:42 -0500 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote: The first two patches implement the pr_cont variants of the formatting functions. The rest convert the existing users to pr_cont and seq functions subsystem-by-subsystem. It'd be the easiest to route all through -mm but the conversion patches can go through individual subsystem trees afterwards if necessary. But you're working on other code which will depend on this? If so perhaps these should be held in your tree. Yeah, that works too. I was still targeting 3.19 window and some of the conversion patches were conflicting, so thought it'd be easier through -mm. Given that the changes aren't that invasive, I think it'd be still a good idea to merge the workqueue debugging during this merge window as it gives a lot more visibility into tricky issues. Once it's agreed on, I'll try to route the feature patches (the first two from this series + actual workqueue changes) early through wq branch. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
