Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-08 Thread york sun
On 08/05/2016 12:01 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:26:26AM +, york sun wrote:
>> I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to
>> separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the
>> way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these
>> functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.
>
> Perhaps you or Johannes could fix this properly to use pci_get_device()
> as the rest of the EDAC drivers do, instead of exporting core PCI
> functions...
>

Boris,

I'd like to separate the first two patches from this set. They are not 
really related to the DDR part I am working on. It will take me a while 
to sort out the correct fix.

York


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-08 Thread york sun
On 08/05/2016 12:01 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:26:26AM +, york sun wrote:
>> I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to
>> separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the
>> way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these
>> functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.
>
> Perhaps you or Johannes could fix this properly to use pci_get_device()
> as the rest of the EDAC drivers do, instead of exporting core PCI
> functions...
>

Boris,

I'd like to separate the first two patches from this set. They are not 
really related to the DDR part I am working on. It will take me a while 
to sort out the correct fix.

York


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-06 Thread york sun
On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> York Sun  writes:
>
>> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>>
>> ---
>> Change log
>>   v3: Change subject tag
>>   v2: no change
>>
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 0f7a60f..86bc484 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct pci_controller* 
>> pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(struct device_node* node)
>>  }
>>  return NULL;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_hose_for_OF_device);
>>
>>  /*
>>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
>> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
>> int bus, int devfn,
>>  {
>>  return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);
>
> Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
> early in boot, before PCI is setup.
>
> AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
> could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).

I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe 
controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If 
yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the 
platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?

York



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-06 Thread york sun
On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> York Sun  writes:
>
>> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>>
>> ---
>> Change log
>>   v3: Change subject tag
>>   v2: no change
>>
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 0f7a60f..86bc484 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct pci_controller* 
>> pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(struct device_node* node)
>>  }
>>  return NULL;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_hose_for_OF_device);
>>
>>  /*
>>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
>> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
>> int bus, int devfn,
>>  {
>>  return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);
>
> Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
> early in boot, before PCI is setup.
>
> AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
> could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).

I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe 
controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If 
yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the 
platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?

York



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 21:20 +, york sun wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 02:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 20:29 +, york sun wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for
> > > > use
> > > > early in boot, before PCI is setup.
> > > > 
> > > > AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> > > > devices should have already been scanned. In which case
> > > > pci_get_device()
> > > > could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
> > > I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe
> > > controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If
> > > yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the
> > > platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?
> > 
> > The platform data comes from add_err_dev() in
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c.
> > 
> Thanks, Scott.
> 
> When add_err_dev() is called, pci is not scanned, is using 
> early_find_capability() justified?

The edac driver is registered with a normal device-level initcall.  The PCI
scanning appears to happen at the subsys initcall level.

-Scott



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 21:20 +, york sun wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 02:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 20:29 +, york sun wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for
> > > > use
> > > > early in boot, before PCI is setup.
> > > > 
> > > > AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> > > > devices should have already been scanned. In which case
> > > > pci_get_device()
> > > > could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
> > > I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe
> > > controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If
> > > yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the
> > > platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?
> > 
> > The platform data comes from add_err_dev() in
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c.
> > 
> Thanks, Scott.
> 
> When add_err_dev() is called, pci is not scanned, is using 
> early_find_capability() justified?

The edac driver is registered with a normal device-level initcall.  The PCI
scanning appears to happen at the subsys initcall level.

-Scott



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread york sun
On 08/05/2016 02:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 20:29 +, york sun wrote:
>> On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
>>> early in boot, before PCI is setup.
>>>
>>> AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
>>> devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
>>> could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
>> I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe
>> controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If
>> yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the
>> platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?
>
>
> The platform data comes from add_err_dev() in arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c.
>

Thanks, Scott.

When add_err_dev() is called, pci is not scanned, is using 
early_find_capability() justified?

York


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread york sun
On 08/05/2016 02:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 20:29 +, york sun wrote:
>> On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
>>> early in boot, before PCI is setup.
>>>
>>> AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
>>> devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
>>> could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
>> I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe
>> controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If
>> yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the
>> platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?
>
>
> The platform data comes from add_err_dev() in arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c.
>

Thanks, Scott.

When add_err_dev() is called, pci is not scanned, is using 
early_find_capability() justified?

York


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 20:29 +, york sun wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > 
> > Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
> > early in boot, before PCI is setup.
> > 
> > AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> > devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
> > could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
> I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe 
> controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If 
> yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the 
> platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?


The platform data comes from add_err_dev() in arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c.

-Scott



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 20:29 +, york sun wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > 
> > Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
> > early in boot, before PCI is setup.
> > 
> > AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> > devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
> > could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
> I am trying to fix this but need some help. We are dealing with PCIe 
> controller here. Does it have a bus number assigned at this point? If 
> yes, how can I find it? I seem not able to find out where the 
> platform_data is filled as well. Can someone kindly point it out to me?


The platform data comes from add_err_dev() in arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c.

-Scott



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread york sun
On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> York Sun  writes:
>
>> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>>
>> ---
>> Change log
>>   v3: Change subject tag
>>   v2: no change
>>
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 0f7a60f..86bc484 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct pci_controller* 
>> pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(struct device_node* node)
>>  }
>>  return NULL;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_hose_for_OF_device);
>>
>>  /*
>>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
>> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
>> int bus, int devfn,
>>  {
>>  return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);
>
> Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
> early in boot, before PCI is setup.
>
> AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
> could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
>

I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to 
separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the 
way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these 
functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.

York



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread york sun
On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> York Sun  writes:
>
>> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>>
>> ---
>> Change log
>>   v3: Change subject tag
>>   v2: no change
>>
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 0f7a60f..86bc484 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct pci_controller* 
>> pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(struct device_node* node)
>>  }
>>  return NULL;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_hose_for_OF_device);
>>
>>  /*
>>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
>> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
>> int bus, int devfn,
>>  {
>>  return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);
>
> Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
> early in boot, before PCI is setup.
>
> AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
> devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
> could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).
>

I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to 
separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the 
way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these 
functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.

York



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread york sun
On 08/04/2016 04:36 PM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 05/08/16 08:58, York Sun wrote:
>> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>
> Good catch! One comment below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan 
>
>>  /*
>>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
>> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
>> int bus, int devfn,
>>  {
>>  return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);
>
> It'd be nicer for this to be renamed as "pci_early_find_capability" or
> something like that with a "namespace", I think.
>

I will rename it if I respin this patch for any reason. Otherwise, I 
will send out another patch to rename it after merging.

York



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread york sun
On 08/04/2016 04:36 PM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 05/08/16 08:58, York Sun wrote:
>> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>
> Good catch! One comment below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan 
>
>>  /*
>>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
>> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
>> int bus, int devfn,
>>  {
>>  return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);
>
> It'd be nicer for this to be renamed as "pci_early_find_capability" or
> something like that with a "namespace", I think.
>

I will rename it if I respin this patch for any reason. Otherwise, I 
will send out another patch to rename it after merging.

York



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:01:26AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:26:26AM +, york sun wrote:
> > I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to 
> > separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the 
> > way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these 
> > functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.
> 
> Perhaps you or Johannes could fix this properly to use pci_get_device()
> as the rest of the EDAC drivers do, instead of exporting core PCI
> functions...

I can give it a shot, but I don't have too much spare time atm and no hardware
to test, so it'll have a strong RFC smell attached to it.

Byte,
Johannes

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn  Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:01:26AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:26:26AM +, york sun wrote:
> > I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to 
> > separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the 
> > way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these 
> > functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.
> 
> Perhaps you or Johannes could fix this properly to use pci_get_device()
> as the rest of the EDAC drivers do, instead of exporting core PCI
> functions...

I can give it a shot, but I don't have too much spare time atm and no hardware
to test, so it'll have a strong RFC smell attached to it.

Byte,
Johannes

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn  Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:26:26AM +, york sun wrote:
> I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to 
> separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the 
> way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these 
> functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.

Perhaps you or Johannes could fix this properly to use pci_get_device()
as the rest of the EDAC drivers do, instead of exporting core PCI
functions...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:26:26AM +, york sun wrote:
> I don't have deep knowledge of this driver. What I am trying is to 
> separate the common DDR part and share it with ARM platforms. Along the 
> way, I found the compiling error if build a module. If exposing these 
> functions becomes a concern, I can live without it.

Perhaps you or Johannes could fix this properly to use pci_get_device()
as the rest of the EDAC drivers do, instead of exporting core PCI
functions...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:39:14PM +, york sun wrote:
> I will rename it if I respin this patch for any reason. Otherwise, I 
> will send out another patch to rename it after merging.

Feel free to send an updated one as a reply to this thread.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-05 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:39:14PM +, york sun wrote:
> I will rename it if I respin this patch for any reason. Otherwise, I 
> will send out another patch to rename it after merging.

Feel free to send an updated one as a reply to this thread.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-04 Thread Michael Ellerman
York Sun  writes:

> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>
> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>
> ---
> Change log
>   v3: Change subject tag
>   v2: no change
>
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index 0f7a60f..86bc484 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct pci_controller* pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(struct 
> device_node* node)
>   }
>   return NULL;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_hose_for_OF_device);
>  
>  /*
>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
> int bus, int devfn,
>  {
>   return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);

Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
early in boot, before PCI is setup.

AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).

cheers


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-04 Thread Michael Ellerman
York Sun  writes:

> Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.
>
> Signed-off-by: York Sun 
>
> ---
> Change log
>   v3: Change subject tag
>   v2: no change
>
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index 0f7a60f..86bc484 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct pci_controller* pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(struct 
> device_node* node)
>   }
>   return NULL;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_hose_for_OF_device);
>  
>  /*
>   * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
> @@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
> int bus, int devfn,
>  {
>   return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);

Does the driver really need to use these routines? They're meant for use
early in boot, before PCI is setup.

AFAICS this is just a regular driver, so when it's probed the PCI
devices should have already been scanned. In which case pci_get_device()
could work couldn't it? (I see other edac drivers doing that).

cheers


Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-04 Thread Andrew Donnellan

On 05/08/16 08:58, York Sun wrote:

Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.

Signed-off-by: York Sun 


Good catch! One comment below.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan 


 /*
  * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
@@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
int bus, int devfn,
 {
return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);


It'd be nicer for this to be renamed as "pci_early_find_capability" or 
something like that with a "namespace", I think.



Andrew

--
Andrew Donnellan  OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com  IBM Australia Limited



Re: [Patch v3 01/11] arch/powerpc/pci: Fix compiling error for mpc85xx_edac

2016-08-04 Thread Andrew Donnellan

On 05/08/16 08:58, York Sun wrote:

Two symbols are missing if mpc85xx_edac driver is compiled as module.

Signed-off-by: York Sun 


Good catch! One comment below.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan 


 /*
  * Reads the interrupt pin to determine if interrupt is use by card.
@@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ int early_find_capability(struct pci_controller *hose, 
int bus, int devfn,
 {
return pci_bus_find_capability(fake_pci_bus(hose, bus), devfn, cap);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(early_find_capability);


It'd be nicer for this to be renamed as "pci_early_find_capability" or 
something like that with a "namespace", I think.



Andrew

--
Andrew Donnellan  OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com  IBM Australia Limited