Re: [RESEND PATCH] rtc: Fix overflow when converting time64_t to rtc_time
On 26/01/2018 at 13:06:01 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: > If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula > 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula > get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem() > function to avoid this situation. > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang> --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c |6 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com
Re: [RESEND PATCH] rtc: Fix overflow when converting time64_t to rtc_time
On 26/01/2018 at 13:06:01 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: > If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula > 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula > get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem() > function to avoid this situation. > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c |6 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com
Re: [RESEND PATCH] rtc: Fix overflow when converting time64_t to rtc_time
Hi Alexandre, On 26 January 2018 at 17:24, Arnd Bergmannwrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Baolin Wang wrote: >> If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula >> 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula >> get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem() >> function to avoid this situation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Could you apply this patch? Since it was pending for a while and it is a bug fix. Thanks. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards
Re: [RESEND PATCH] rtc: Fix overflow when converting time64_t to rtc_time
Hi Alexandre, On 26 January 2018 at 17:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Baolin Wang wrote: >> If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula >> 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula >> get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem() >> function to avoid this situation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Could you apply this patch? Since it was pending for a while and it is a bug fix. Thanks. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards
Re: [RESEND PATCH] rtc: Fix overflow when converting time64_t to rtc_time
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Baolin Wangwrote: > If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula > 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula > get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem() > function to avoid this situation. > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Re: [RESEND PATCH] rtc: Fix overflow when converting time64_t to rtc_time
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Baolin Wang wrote: > If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula > 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula > get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem() > function to avoid this situation. > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann