Re: [RESEND PATCH 11/11] tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM)

2016-12-01 Thread Luc, Piotr
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 01:47 -0500, Len Brown wrote: > Piotr, > Thanks for sending the patch, I've made this change to my turbostat > branch for 4.10. > > I did not apply your patch directly because for some reason it didn't > appear in patchwork for linux-pm, > only for lkml, which I do not

Re: [RESEND PATCH 11/11] tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM)

2016-12-01 Thread Luc, Piotr
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 01:47 -0500, Len Brown wrote: > Piotr, > Thanks for sending the patch, I've made this change to my turbostat > branch for 4.10. > > I did not apply your patch directly because for some reason it didn't > appear in patchwork for linux-pm, > only for lkml, which I do not

Re: [RESEND PATCH 11/11] tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM)

2016-11-30 Thread Len Brown
Piotr, Thanks for sending the patch, I've made this change to my turbostat branch for 4.10. I did not apply your patch directly because for some reason it didn't appear in patchwork for linux-pm, only for lkml, which I do not review. Also, your patch depended on your style update patch to use

Re: [RESEND PATCH 11/11] tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM)

2016-11-30 Thread Len Brown
Piotr, Thanks for sending the patch, I've made this change to my turbostat branch for 4.10. I did not apply your patch directly because for some reason it didn't appear in patchwork for linux-pm, only for lkml, which I do not review. Also, your patch depended on your style update patch to use