On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:43 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Paul Menage wrote:
> > On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't appear to have documented this yet, but I think a good
> > naming scheme for container files is . - i.e.
> > these should be memctlr.usage and
Paul Menage wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two
separate files, or multi-line output:
usage: %lu kB
limit: %lu kB
Two separate files would be the container usage model that I
envisaged, inherited
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the
containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring
and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit.
The patches use
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two
separate files, or multi-line output:
usage: %lu kB
limit: %lu kB
Two separate files would be the container usage model that I
envisaged, inherited from the way cpusets
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the
> containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring
> and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit.
The patches use the identifier
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the
containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring
and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit.
The patches use the identifier memctlr
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two
separate files, or multi-line output:
usage: %lu kB
limit: %lu kB
Two separate files would be the container usage model that I
envisaged, inherited from the way cpusets does
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the
containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring
and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit.
The patches use
Paul Menage wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two
separate files, or multi-line output:
usage: %lu kB
limit: %lu kB
Two separate files would be the container usage model that I
envisaged, inherited from
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:43 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Paul Menage wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Hmm, I don't appear to have documented this yet, but I think a good
naming scheme for container files is subsystem.whatever - i.e.
these should be
10 matches
Mail list logo