Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Matthew Helsley
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:43 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > Paul Menage wrote: > > On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, I don't appear to have documented this yet, but I think a good > > naming scheme for container files is . - i.e. > > these should be memctlr.usage and

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Balbir Singh
Paul Menage wrote: On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two separate files, or multi-line output: usage: %lu kB limit: %lu kB Two separate files would be the container usage model that I envisaged, inherited

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Balbir Singh
Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit. The patches use

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Paul Menage
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two separate files, or multi-line output: usage: %lu kB limit: %lu kB Two separate files would be the container usage model that I envisaged, inherited from the way cpusets

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the > containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring > and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit. The patches use the identifier

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit. The patches use the identifier memctlr

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Paul Menage
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two separate files, or multi-line output: usage: %lu kB limit: %lu kB Two separate files would be the container usage model that I envisaged, inherited from the way cpusets does

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Balbir Singh
Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:26 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch sets up the basic controller infrastructure on top of the containers infrastructure. Two files are provided for monitoring and control memctlr_usage and memctlr_limit. The patches use

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Balbir Singh
Paul Menage wrote: On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two separate files, or multi-line output: usage: %lu kB limit: %lu kB Two separate files would be the container usage model that I envisaged, inherited from

Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup

2007-02-19 Thread Matthew Helsley
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:43 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: Paul Menage wrote: On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Hmm, I don't appear to have documented this yet, but I think a good naming scheme for container files is subsystem.whatever - i.e. these should be