On 09/01/2018 04:28 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> To walk 1TB memory of 4k active pages, it costs 2s vs 15s system
> time to scan the per-task/global idle bitmaps.
To me, that says this interface simply won't work on large systems. 2s
and 15s are both simply unacceptably long.
> OTOH, the per-task
On 09/01/2018 04:28 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> To walk 1TB memory of 4k active pages, it costs 2s vs 15s system
> time to scan the per-task/global idle bitmaps.
To me, that says this interface simply won't work on large systems. 2s
and 15s are both simply unacceptably long.
> OTOH, the per-task
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 07:28:20PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h
> index da3dbfa09e79..732a502acc27 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
> @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ extern const struct file_operations
>
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 07:28:20PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h
> index da3dbfa09e79..732a502acc27 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
> @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ extern const struct file_operations
>
4 matches
Mail list logo