Hi Yisheng,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:29:24AM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> On 2016/9/19 22:07, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> > Can you modify the warning in cpumask.h to dump the bad CPU number? That
> > would make it fairly clear if that's
On 2016/9/20 10:01, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> hi all,
>> When I enable NUMA in BIOS for arm64, it failed to boot on
>> v4.8-rc4-162-g071e31e.
>> For the crash log, it seems caused by error number of cpumask.
>> Any ideas about it?
>
> When I playe
On 2016/9/19 22:07, Mark Rutland wrote:
> [adding LAKML, arm64 maintainers]
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> hi all,
>
> Can you modify the warning in cpumask.h to dump the bad CPU number? That
> would make it fairly clear if that's the case.
>
hi Mark,
I dum
On 2016/9/19 22:07, Mark Rutland wrote:
> [adding LAKML, arm64 maintainers]
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> hi all,
> Hi,
>
> In future, please make sure to Cc LAKML along with relevant parties when
> sending arm64 patches/queries.
>
> For everyone newly Cc'd, th
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> hi all,
> When I enable NUMA in BIOS for arm64, it failed to boot on
> v4.8-rc4-162-g071e31e.
> For the crash log, it seems caused by error number of cpumask.
> Any ideas about it?
When I played v4.7 on ARM64 with NUMA, I saw the same issue[1
On 2016/9/19 22:45, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:07:19PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> [adding LAKML, arm64 maintainers]
>
> I've also looped in Euler ThunderTown, since (a) he's at Huawei and is
> assumedly testing this stuff and (b) he has a fairly big NUMA patch
> series do
On 19/09/16 15:07, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> For the crash log, it seems caused by error number of cpumask.
>> Any ideas about it?
> Much earlier in your log, there was a (non-fatal) warning, as below. Do
> you see this without NUMA/SRAT
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:07:19PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> [adding LAKML, arm64 maintainers]
I've also looped in Euler ThunderTown, since (a) he's at Huawei and is
assumedly testing this stuff and (b) he has a fairly big NUMA patch
series doing the rounds (some of which I've queued).
> On Mo
[adding LAKML, arm64 maintainers]
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> hi all,
Hi,
In future, please make sure to Cc LAKML along with relevant parties when
sending arm64 patches/queries.
For everyone newly Cc'd, the original message (with attachments) can be
found at:
9 matches
Mail list logo
