On 01/06/16 21:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> This is an alternative approach to '[RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect
>> sched_entity movement into task_group's utilization' which requires
>> '[RFC PATCH] sched: fix hierarchical order in
On 01/06/16 21:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> This is an alternative approach to '[RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect
>> sched_entity movement into task_group's utilization' which requires
>> '[RFC PATCH] sched: fix hierarchical order in
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> This is an alternative approach to '[RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect
> sched_entity movement into task_group's utilization' which requires
> '[RFC PATCH] sched: fix hierarchical order in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list'
Awesome, a 3rd
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> This is an alternative approach to '[RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect
> sched_entity movement into task_group's utilization' which requires
> '[RFC PATCH] sched: fix hierarchical order in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list'
Awesome, a 3rd
4 matches
Mail list logo