Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

2024-01-18 Thread SeongJae Park
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 19:40:16 +0900 Hyeongtak Ji wrote: > Hi SeongJae, > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 SeongJae Park wrote: > > [...] > >> Let's say there are 3 nodes in the system and the first node0 and node1 > >> are the first tier, and node2 is the second tier. > >> > >> $ cat

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

2024-01-18 Thread Hyeongtak Ji
Hi SeongJae, On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 SeongJae Park wrote: [...] >> Let's say there are 3 nodes in the system and the first node0 and node1 >> are the first tier, and node2 is the second tier. >> >> $ cat /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier4/nodelist >> 0-1 >> >> $ cat

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

2024-01-17 Thread SeongJae Park
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:11:03 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote: [...] > Hi Honggyu, > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:49:25 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote: > > > Hi SeongJae, > > > > Thanks very much for your comments in details. > > > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:31:59 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote: > > [...] > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

2024-01-17 Thread SeongJae Park
Hi Honggyu, On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:49:25 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote: > Hi SeongJae, > > Thanks very much for your comments in details. > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:31:59 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote: > > > Thank you so much for this great patches and the above nice test results. I > > believe the

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

2024-01-17 Thread Honggyu Kim
Hi SeongJae, Thanks very much for your comments in details. On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:31:59 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote: > Thank you so much for this great patches and the above nice test results. I > believe the test setup and results make sense, and merging a revised version > of > this

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory

2024-01-16 Thread SeongJae Park
Hello, On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:52:48 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote: > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously > posted at [1]. > > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action > are made. This RFC is about its implementation for physical