Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> >>> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> >>> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk >>> > about this? >>> >>> Still waiting for my

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk >> > about this? >> >> Still waiting for my invite... >> >> But I will

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk >> > about this? >> >> Still waiting for my invite... >> >> But I will be at Plumbers if folks want to discuss

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

[ this time w/o the html ] On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk > > about this? > > Still waiting for my invite... > > But I will be at Plumbers if folks want to discuss this. Hey Rob, I'm

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

[ this time w/o the html ] On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk > > about this? > > Still waiting for my invite... > > But I will be at Plumbers if folks want to discuss this. Hey Rob, I'm here so let's make

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

Hi, On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:02:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> [...] > > I had a more detailed look at the series during the last two weeks. > > For me the approach

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

Hi, On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:02:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> [...] > > I had a more detailed look at the series during the last two weeks. > > For me the approach

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the >> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio >> and

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the >> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio >> and decided extending

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

Hi, On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the > existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio > and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires > adding DT

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

Hi, On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the > existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio > and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires > adding DT

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote: >> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the >> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio >> and decided extending it does make

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote: >> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the >> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio >> and decided extending it does make sense. Using

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote: > This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the > existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio > and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires > adding DT based device matching

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote: > This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the > existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio > and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires > adding DT based device matching