Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Juri Lelli
On 07/12/15 13:18, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 07/12/15 12:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > It looks like the second patch doesn't yet have the backing from the DT > > > people, which prevents the remainder of the

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 07/12/15 12:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > It looks like the second patch doesn't yet have the backing from the DT > > people, which prevents the remainder of the patch set progressing. That's > > the sticking point which

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Juri Lelli
On 07/12/15 12:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:02:44PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > Hi again everybody, > > > > thanks a lot to Rob and Vincent for feedback, but, IMHO, we'd need more > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:02:44PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Hi again everybody, > > thanks a lot to Rob and Vincent for feedback, but, IMHO, we'd need more > discussion happening on this series to figure out how we move forward; > so,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Juri Lelli
On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi all, > Hi again everybody, thanks a lot to Rob and Vincent for feedback, but, IMHO, we'd need more discussion happening on this series to figure out how we move forward; so, this is a ping :-). It's a simple information that we need to figure out how

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Juri Lelli
On 07/12/15 13:18, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 07/12/15 12:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > It looks like the second patch doesn't yet have the backing from the DT > > > people, which prevents the remainder of the

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Juri Lelli
On 07/12/15 12:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:02:44PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > Hi again everybody, > > > > thanks a lot to Rob and Vincent for feedback, but, IMHO, we'd need more > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Juri Lelli
On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi all, > Hi again everybody, thanks a lot to Rob and Vincent for feedback, but, IMHO, we'd need more discussion happening on this series to figure out how we move forward; so, this is a ping :-). It's a simple information that we need to figure out how

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:02:44PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Hi again everybody, > > thanks a lot to Rob and Vincent for feedback, but, IMHO, we'd need more > discussion happening on this series to figure out how we move forward; > so,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

2015-12-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 07/12/15 12:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > It looks like the second patch doesn't yet have the backing from the DT > > people, which prevents the remainder of the patch set progressing. That's > > the sticking point which