On 07/10/16 10:14, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Jon Hunter writes:
>
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
>> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated
On 07/10/16 10:14, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Jon Hunter writes:
>
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
>> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a single PM
>>
Jon Hunter writes:
> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a single PM
> domain and so cannot easily
Jon Hunter writes:
> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a single PM
> domain and so cannot easily be associated with more
Hi PM posse!
On 23/09/16 15:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 21/09/16 15:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 21/09/16 09:53,
Hi PM posse!
On 23/09/16 15:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 21/09/16 15:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Sep
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 21/09/16 15:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 21/09/16 15:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some devices may
Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 15:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Some devices may
Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 15:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>>> not
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore,
Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
>> 'device' structure
Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
>> 'device' structure
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a single PM
> domain and
On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a single PM
> domain and so cannot easily be
On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a single PM
> domain and so cannot easily be
20 matches
Mail list logo