- On Oct 17, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> - On Oct 17, 2018, at 3:19 AM, Srikar Dronamraju sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mathieu,
>>
>>> +static int do_cpu_opv(struct cpu_op *cpuop, int cpuopcnt,
>>> + struct
- On Oct 17, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> - On Oct 17, 2018, at 3:19 AM, Srikar Dronamraju sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mathieu,
>>
>>> +static int do_cpu_opv(struct cpu_op *cpuop, int cpuopcnt,
>>> + struct
- On Oct 17, 2018, at 3:19 AM, Srikar Dronamraju sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
>> +static int do_cpu_opv(struct cpu_op *cpuop, int cpuopcnt,
>> + struct cpu_opv_vaddr *vaddr_ptrs, int cpu)
>> +{
>> +struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>> +int ret;
- On Oct 17, 2018, at 3:19 AM, Srikar Dronamraju sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
>> +static int do_cpu_opv(struct cpu_op *cpuop, int cpuopcnt,
>> + struct cpu_opv_vaddr *vaddr_ptrs, int cpu)
>> +{
>> +struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>> +int ret;
Hi Mathieu,
> +static int do_cpu_opv(struct cpu_op *cpuop, int cpuopcnt,
> + struct cpu_opv_vaddr *vaddr_ptrs, int cpu)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + int ret;
> +
> +retry:
> + if (cpu != raw_smp_processor_id()) {
> + ret =
Hi Mathieu,
> +static int do_cpu_opv(struct cpu_op *cpuop, int cpuopcnt,
> + struct cpu_opv_vaddr *vaddr_ptrs, int cpu)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + int ret;
> +
> +retry:
> + if (cpu != raw_smp_processor_id()) {
> + ret =
Hi Mathieu,
On (10/16/18 15:17), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Therefore, only an internal kernel bug between vm_map_user_ram() and
> vm_unmap_user_ram() should trigger the BUG_ON(). No user input is passed
> to vm_unmap_user_ram().
>
> Now, let's look at vm_map_user_ram(). It calls
Hi Mathieu,
On (10/16/18 15:17), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Therefore, only an internal kernel bug between vm_map_user_ram() and
> vm_unmap_user_ram() should trigger the BUG_ON(). No user input is passed
> to vm_unmap_user_ram().
>
> Now, let's look at vm_map_user_ram(). It calls
- On Oct 16, 2018, at 4:10 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
sergey.senozhatsky.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On (10/10/18 15:19), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> [..]
>> +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(cpu_opv, struct cpu_op __user *, ucpuopv, int, cpuopcnt,
>> +int, cpu, int, flags)
>> +{
> [..]
- On Oct 16, 2018, at 4:10 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
sergey.senozhatsky.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On (10/10/18 15:19), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> [..]
>> +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(cpu_opv, struct cpu_op __user *, ucpuopv, int, cpuopcnt,
>> +int, cpu, int, flags)
>> +{
> [..]
Hi Mathieu,
On (10/10/18 15:19), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[..]
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(cpu_opv, struct cpu_op __user *, ucpuopv, int, cpuopcnt,
> + int, cpu, int, flags)
> +{
[..]
> +again:
> + ret = cpu_opv_pin_pages(cpuopv, cpuopcnt, _ptrs);
> + if (ret)
> + goto end;
Hi Mathieu,
On (10/10/18 15:19), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[..]
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(cpu_opv, struct cpu_op __user *, ucpuopv, int, cpuopcnt,
> + int, cpu, int, flags)
> +{
[..]
> +again:
> + ret = cpu_opv_pin_pages(cpuopv, cpuopcnt, _ptrs);
> + if (ret)
> + goto end;
12 matches
Mail list logo