On 10/09/2015 02:14 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> Though I understand the initial stated motivation here (avoiding a
>> > redundant capacity request upon idle entry), releasing the CPU's
>> > capacity request altogether on idle seems like it could be a contentious
>> > policy decision.
>> >
>> > An
On 10/09/2015 02:14 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> Though I understand the initial stated motivation here (avoiding a
>> > redundant capacity request upon idle entry), releasing the CPU's
>> > capacity request altogether on idle seems like it could be a contentious
>> > policy decision.
>> >
>> > An
Hi Steve,
On 08/10/15 21:40, Steve Muckle wrote:
> Hi Juri,
>
> On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> From: Juri Lelli
>>
>> When a CPU is going idle it is pointless to ask for an OPP update as we
>> would wake up another task only to ask for the same capacity we are already
>>
Hi Steve,
On 08/10/15 21:40, Steve Muckle wrote:
> Hi Juri,
>
> On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> From: Juri Lelli
>>
>> When a CPU is going idle it is pointless to ask for an OPP update as we
>> would wake up another task only to ask for the same capacity
Hi Juri,
On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> From: Juri Lelli
>
> When a CPU is going idle it is pointless to ask for an OPP update as we
> would wake up another task only to ask for the same capacity we are already
> running at (utilization gets moved to blocked_utilization). We
Hi Juri,
On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> From: Juri Lelli
>
> When a CPU is going idle it is pointless to ask for an OPP update as we
> would wake up another task only to ask for the same capacity we are already
> running at (utilization gets moved to
6 matches
Mail list logo