Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: zero MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL before suspend

2018-04-12 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 12.04.18 at 09:32, wrote: > > > * Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >> >>> On 11.04.18 at 13:53, wrote: > >> > * Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > > >> >> Additionally, x86 maintainers: is there a particular reason this (or > >> >> any functionally equivalent patch) isn't ups

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: zero MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL before suspend

2018-04-12 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 12.04.18 at 09:32, wrote: > * Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 11.04.18 at 13:53, wrote: >> > * Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >> >> Additionally, x86 maintainers: is there a particular reason this (or >> >> any functionally equivalent patch) isn't upstream yet? As indicated >> >> before, I ha

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: zero MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL before suspend

2018-04-12 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 11.04.18 at 13:53, wrote: > > * Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >> Additionally, x86 maintainers: is there a particular reason this (or > >> any functionally equivalent patch) isn't upstream yet? As indicated > >> before, I had not been able to find any discussion, and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: zero MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL before suspend

2018-04-11 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 11.04.18 at 13:53, wrote: > * Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Additionally, x86 maintainers: is there a particular reason this (or >> any functionally equivalent patch) isn't upstream yet? As indicated >> before, I had not been able to find any discussion, and hence I >> see no reason why this is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: zero MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL before suspend

2018-04-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich wrote: > Additionally, x86 maintainers: is there a particular reason this (or > any functionally equivalent patch) isn't upstream yet? As indicated > before, I had not been able to find any discussion, and hence I > see no reason why this is a patch we effectively carry privately i