Re: [stable] Deleting "mt7621-mmc" with "interesting" license?

On Thu 2019-08-15 10:44:06, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:59:27AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Thu 2019-08-15 09:51:32, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:13:50AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I realize that "interesting" license is not on

Re: [stable] Deleting "mt7621-mmc" with "interesting" license?

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:59:27AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2019-08-15 09:51:32, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:13:50AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I realize that "interesting" license is not on a list of bugs suitable > > > for -stable, but on the

Re: [stable] Deleting "mt7621-mmc" with "interesting" license?

On Thu 2019-08-15 09:51:32, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:13:50AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I realize that "interesting" license is not on a list of bugs suitable > > for -stable, but on the other hand, this tends to scare corporate > > lawyers... so perhaps we

Re: [stable] Deleting "mt7621-mmc" with "interesting" license?

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:13:50AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > I realize that "interesting" license is not on a list of bugs suitable > for -stable, but on the other hand, this tends to scare corporate > lawyers... so perhaps we should remove the driver in -stable, too? > > Upstream