Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> I got this one while compiling on NFS.
>>
>> C.
>>
>> kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480!
>
> I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are
> not, with
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> I got this one while compiling on NFS.
>
> C.
>
> kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480!
I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are
not, with rc4-mm1 there are two patches (first
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:17:18AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
>
> Will appear later at
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
I got this one while compiling on NFS.
C.
kernel BUG at
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this
change then
- certainly
On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 December
On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this
change then
- certainly looks networking related.
yep,
Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
I got this one while compiling on NFS.
C.
kernel BUG at
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:17:18AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
I got this one while compiling on NFS.
C.
kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480!
I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are
not, with rc4-mm1 there are two patches (first one was
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
I got this one while compiling on NFS.
C.
kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480!
I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are
not, with rc4-mm1 there are
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > From what i can roughly
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change
>>> then
>>> - certainly looks networking related.
>> yep, but it
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
>>
>>> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over
to
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> > > between acpi and
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between
acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> > between acpi and
> > the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
between acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between
acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
between acpi and
the
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
From: Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over
to e1000e. So if your e1000
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change
then
- certainly looks networking related.
yep, but it isn't e1000. It's
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:17:01 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changes since 2.6.24-rc3-mm2:
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 brought a nice TCP oops on my x86_64 system, while I
was stress-testing the VM and watching via ssh:
general protection fault: [1] SMP
last sysfs file:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:29:18 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Dec 6 21:24:28 erratic-orbits init: tty3 main process (2991)
> > > terminated with status 1
> >
> > Boggle. We broke the vt driver?
> >
> > config, please...
>
> I sent the .config.
I didn't receive it but I found
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> between acpi and
> the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code
> to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:17:16 -0800 Kok, Auke wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
> > "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> > -
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
> "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> over
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
"Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> >>> over
> >>> to e1000e.
Kok, Auke wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
CONFIG_E1000E.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
>>> over
>>> to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
>>> CONFIG_E1000E.
>>>
>>>
>> Wouldn't
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:00:24PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > Hi
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere:
> > http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr
> >
> > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> > over
> > to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
> > CONFIG_E1000E.
> >
> >
> Wouldn't it make sense to just
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > > Hi Len,
> > >
> > > after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba,
I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere:
http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid
for `pop'
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/syscall.S:25: Error:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > Hi Len,
> >
> > after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
> > fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:20:05 -0800 Martin Bligh wrote:
> >- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
> > moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot
> > to set CONFIG_E1000E.
>
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was
>- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
> moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot
> to set CONFIG_E1000E.
Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on?
As far as I can see that's not true, which will screwing everybody
On 11/12/2007 8:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100
Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:08:00 -0800
> Or should this have been sys_nis_syscall()?
sys_nis_syscall() was used in cases on sparc where we wanted
to get a log of invocations of unimplemented syscalls, as it
aided debugging and anaylsis.
But the usefulness
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:08:00 -0800
Or should this have been sys_nis_syscall()?
sys_nis_syscall() was used in cases on sparc where we wanted
to get a log of invocations of unimplemented syscalls, as it
aided debugging and anaylsis.
But the usefulness of
On 11/12/2007 8:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100
Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot
to set CONFIG_E1000E.
Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on?
As far as I can see that's not true, which will screwing everybody
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:20:05 -0800 Martin Bligh wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot
to set CONFIG_E1000E.
Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on?
As
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere:
http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid
for `pop'
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/syscall.S:25: Error:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
CONFIG_E1000E.
Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere:
http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid for
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:00:24PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
CONFIG_E1000E.
Wouldn't it make sense to just default
Kok, Auke wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
CONFIG_E1000E.
Wouldn't it make sense
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:17:16 -0800 Kok, Auke wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
between acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code
to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the machine,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:29:18 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dec 6 21:24:28 erratic-orbits init: tty3 main process (2991)
terminated with status 1
Boggle. We broke the vt driver?
config, please...
I sent the .config.
I didn't receive it but I found a config from you
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:17:01 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes since 2.6.24-rc3-mm2:
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 brought a nice TCP oops on my x86_64 system, while I
was stress-testing the VM and watching via ssh:
general protection fault: [1] SMP
last sysfs file:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100
Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> >
> > Will appear later at
> >
> >
> >
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Dave, please include this one to net-2.6.25.
...
> --
> [PATCH] [TCP]: Fix fack_count miscountings (multiple places)
I've better version of this coming up, so Dave please don't put this one
into net-2.6.25 (noticed that both the original and the
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change
> > then
> > - certainly looks networking related.
>
> yep, but it isn't e1000. It's core
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change
then
- certainly looks networking related.
yep, but it isn't e1000. It's core TCP.
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Dave, please include this one to net-2.6.25.
...
--
[PATCH] [TCP]: Fix fack_count miscountings (multiple places)
I've better version of this coming up, so Dave please don't put this one
into net-2.6.25 (noticed that both the original and the after
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100
Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
On Dec 8, 2007 6:22 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
> > inline functions like this:
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292:
2007/12/7, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
> inline functions like this:
> drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed
> in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Len,
>
> after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
> fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
> "Critical temperature reached (255 C)." However, the degrees
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:45:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800
>
> > That's
> >
> > J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh));
> >
> > at the end of journal_unmap_buffer().
> >
> > I don't
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800
> That's
>
> J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh));
>
> at the end of journal_unmap_buffer().
>
> I don't recall seeing that before and I can't think of anything we've
> done recently which could cause it,
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800
That's
J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh));
at the end of journal_unmap_buffer().
I don't recall seeing that before and I can't think of anything we've
done recently which could cause it, sorry.
If
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:45:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800
That's
J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh));
at the end of journal_unmap_buffer().
I don't recall seeing that
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
Critical temperature reached (255 C). However, the degrees number
is
2007/12/7, Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
inline functions like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed
in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available
fix
On Dec 8, 2007 6:22 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
inline functions like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry,
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:02:54 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> > > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [cut]
> > >
> > Dec 6 21:24:28 erratic-orbits init: tty3 main process (2991)
> > terminated with status 1
>
> Boggle. We broke the vt driver?
>
> config, please...
I sent the .config. Is there nothing else to follow up on? I have
tried rebuilding about seven kernels, tweaking the options each time.
All
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:20:28 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The box is sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64). This was caught when
> system (gentoo) was emerging some package.
>
> [27006.402237] kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1894!
That's
J_ASSERT_BH(bh,
Hello,
The box is sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64). This was caught when
system (gentoo) was emerging some package.
[27006.402237] kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1894!
[27006.402268] \|/ \|/
[27006.402274] "@'/ .. \`@"
[27006.402279] /_|
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [cut]
> > > > > Now with MM kernels 2.6.24 rc1-4 the PCMCIA adapter works again,
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `sys_call_table32':
> > arch/sparc64/kernel/head.S:(.text+0x224e0): undefined reference to
> > `compat_sys_timerfd'
> > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> argh, sorry, I am soo fed up with fixing that patch.
>
> ---
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `sys_call_table32':
arch/sparc64/kernel/head.S:(.text+0x224e0): undefined reference to
`compat_sys_timerfd'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
argh, sorry, I am soo fed up with fixing that patch.
---
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
Now with MM kernels 2.6.24 rc1-4 the PCMCIA adapter works again, but I
only
Hello,
The box is sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64). This was caught when
system (gentoo) was emerging some package.
[27006.402237] kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1894!
[27006.402268] \|/ \|/
[27006.402274] @'/ .. \`@
[27006.402279] /_| \__/
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:20:28 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The box is sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64). This was caught when
system (gentoo) was emerging some package.
[27006.402237] kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1894!
That's
J_ASSERT_BH(bh,
Dec 6 21:24:28 erratic-orbits init: tty3 main process (2991)
terminated with status 1
Boggle. We broke the vt driver?
config, please...
I sent the .config. Is there nothing else to follow up on? I have
tried rebuilding about seven kernels, tweaking the options each time.
All the
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
Now with MM
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:02:54 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[cut]
> > > > Now with MM kernels 2.6.24 rc1-4 the PCMCIA adapter works again, but I
> > > > only get read rates of 1.6 MB/s. When it used to work in 2.6.20 I got
>
Zan Lynx wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I'm reporting
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:26:43 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Today I noticed pgrep doesn't work. It seems the reason is a missing
>> Name: tag in the status file for a process in /proc.
>>
>> # cat /proc/1/status
>> init
>> State: S
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 01:04:55 +0100
Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried it on sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64) station. Unfortunately it
> failed
> to compile.
>
> AS arch/sparc64/lib/xor.o
> AR arch/sparc64/lib/lib.a
> GEN .version
> CHK
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:26:43 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I noticed pgrep doesn't work. It seems the reason is a missing
> Name: tag in the status file for a process in /proc.
>
> # cat /proc/1/status
> init
> State: S (sleeping)
> Tgid: 1
> Pid:1
> PPid: 0
>
Hello,
I tried it on sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64) station. Unfortunately it
failed
to compile.
AS arch/sparc64/lib/xor.o
AR arch/sparc64/lib/lib.a
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
dnsdomainname: Unknown host
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
> > > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:05:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
> > about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
> >
> > On nearly all my
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
