Re: Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consistency for SmPL rules

2018-02-02 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> * Do we agree that a proper size determination is essential for every >> condition in the discussed SmPL rules together with forwarding >> this information? > > No. I don't mind a few false positives. Do you care to split SmPL rules by their confidence category in such an use case?

Re: Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consistency for SmPL rules

2018-02-02 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> * Do we agree that a proper size determination is essential for every >> condition in the discussed SmPL rules together with forwarding >> this information? > > No. I don't mind a few false positives. Do you care to split SmPL rules by their confidence category in such an use case?