On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:49:39PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
>
> Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
I have always used:
--enable-buffy-sizeUse file size attribute instead
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:53:18PM +0200, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:49:39PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
> >
> > Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
>
> I
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:40:10AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
> as you mentioned in the relatime changelog, so I'm surprised that
> they turned it on by default. With relatime fixing that however,
> I'm also unaware of
On Mon, 12 February 2007 18:49:39 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> >The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
>
> Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
> bash does?
Just a guess: because it
Hi,
On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
> > > not to make this a default mount option ?
> >
> > Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the default for some time
> > now, with no obvious problems (I'm running Ubuntu). I
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:55:04PM -0800, Valerie Henson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 07:54:00PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
> > not to make this a default mount option ?
>
> Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:55:04PM -0800, Valerie Henson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 07:54:00PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
not to make this a default mount option ?
Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the
Hi,
On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote:
Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
not to make this a default mount option ?
Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the default for some time
now, with no obvious problems (I'm running Ubuntu). I see relatime
On Mon, 12 February 2007 18:49:39 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote:
The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
bash does?
Just a guess: because it has to
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:40:10AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
as you mentioned in the relatime changelog, so I'm surprised that
they turned it on by default. With relatime fixing that however,
I'm also unaware of anything
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:53:18PM +0200, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:49:39PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
I have always
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:49:39PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
I have always used:
--enable-buffy-sizeUse file size attribute instead of
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 07:54:00PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
> not to make this a default mount option ?
Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the default for some time
now, with no obvious problems (I'm running Ubuntu). I
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:56:07AM -0800, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Val,
>
> I'm just updating the mount(2) man page for MS_RELATIME, and this is the
> text I've come up with:
>
>MS_RELATIME(Since Linux 2.6.20)
> When a file on this file system is accessed, only
>
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:56:07AM -0800, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Val,
I'm just updating the mount(2) man page for MS_RELATIME, and this is the
text I've come up with:
MS_RELATIME(Since Linux 2.6.20)
When a file on this file system is accessed, only
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 07:54:00PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
not to make this a default mount option ?
Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the default for some time
now, with no obvious problems (I'm running Ubuntu). I see
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:56:07AM -0800, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Val,
>
> I'm just updating the mount(2) man page for MS_RELATIME, and this is the
> text I've come up with:
>
>MS_RELATIME(Since Linux 2.6.20)
> When a file on this file system is accessed, only
>
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:56:07AM -0800, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Val,
I'm just updating the mount(2) man page for MS_RELATIME, and this is the
text I've come up with:
MS_RELATIME(Since Linux 2.6.20)
When a file on this file system is accessed, only
18 matches
Mail list logo
