Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On 9/6/05, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 02:55, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:48, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Maw, 2005-09-06 at 02:48 -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without > > ever seeing the code? > > You told me you are using a dlm for a single-node application, is there >

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 02:55, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:48, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without > > > ever seeing the code? > > > > You

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:48, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without > > ever seeing the code? > > You told me you are using a dlm for a single-node application, is there >

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without > ever seeing the code? You told me you are using a dlm for a single-node application, is there anything more I need to know? Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without ever seeing the code? You told me you are using a dlm for a single-node application, is there anything more I need to know? Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:48, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without ever seeing the code? You told me you are using a dlm for a single-node application, is there

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 02:55, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:48, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without ever seeing the code? You told me you

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Maw, 2005-09-06 at 02:48 -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without ever seeing the code? You told me you are using a dlm for a single-node application, is there anything

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On 9/6/05, Daniel Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 02:55, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:48, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 05 September 2005 23:58, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Monday 05 September 2005 23:02, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > By the way, you said "alpha server" not "alpha servers", was that just a > > > slip? Because if you don't have

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-05 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Monday 05 September 2005 23:02, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > By the way, you said "alpha server" not "alpha servers", was that just a > > slip? Because if you don't have a cluster then why are you using a dlm? > > No, it is not a slip.

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 05 September 2005 23:02, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > By the way, you said "alpha server" not "alpha servers", was that just a > slip? > Because if you don't have a cluster then why are you using a dlm? > No, it is not a slip. The application is running on just one node, so we do not

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 05 September 2005 23:02, Daniel Phillips wrote: By the way, you said alpha server not alpha servers, was that just a slip? Because if you don't have a cluster then why are you using a dlm? No, it is not a slip. The application is running on just one node, so we do not really

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-05 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Monday 05 September 2005 23:02, Daniel Phillips wrote: By the way, you said alpha server not alpha servers, was that just a slip? Because if you don't have a cluster then why are you using a dlm? No, it is not a slip. The

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 05 September 2005 23:58, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Monday 05 September 2005 23:02, Daniel Phillips wrote: By the way, you said alpha server not alpha servers, was that just a slip? Because if you don't have a cluster