Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kai Germaschewski writes:
> > The patch is right, the explanation was wrong. Sorry, I didn't CC l-k when
> > I found what was really going on. Other source files used a global
> > initialized variable "divert_if" as well, so this became the same one as
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kai Germaschewski writes:
The patch is right, the explanation was wrong. Sorry, I didn't CC l-k when
I found what was really going on. Other source files used a global
initialized variable "divert_if" as well, so this became the same one as
the one
Kai Germaschewski writes:
> The patch is right, the explanation was wrong. Sorry, I didn't CC l-k when
> I found what was really going on. Other source files used a global
> initialized variable "divert_if" as well, so this became the same one as
> the one referenced in isdn_common.c. That's why
On 3 Jan 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Kai Germaschewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the problem was that we relied on divert_if being initialized to
> > zero automatically, which didn't happen because it was not declared static
> > and therefore not in .bss (*is this true?*).
>
Kai Germaschewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Gerold Jury wrote:
>
> > I have reversed the patches part by part, the only thing that makes a
> > difference is the diversion services.
> > The reason for this remains unknown for me.
>
> I think I found it. Could everybody
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> I think the problem was that we relied on divert_if being initialized to
> zero automatically, which didn't happen because it was not declared static
> and therefore not in .bss (*is this true?*).
This is true in this particular case, and your
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
I think the problem was that we relied on divert_if being initialized to
zero automatically, which didn't happen because it was not declared static
and therefore not in .bss (*is this true?*).
This is true in this particular case, and your added
Kai Germaschewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Gerold Jury wrote:
I have reversed the patches part by part, the only thing that makes a
difference is the diversion services.
The reason for this remains unknown for me.
I think I found it. Could everybody who was
On 3 Jan 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Kai Germaschewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the problem was that we relied on divert_if being initialized to
zero automatically, which didn't happen because it was not declared static
and therefore not in .bss (*is this true?*).
All
Kai Germaschewski writes:
The patch is right, the explanation was wrong. Sorry, I didn't CC l-k when
I found what was really going on. Other source files used a global
initialized variable "divert_if" as well, so this became the same one as
the one referenced in isdn_common.c. That's why it
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Gerold Jury wrote (in a private message, sorry):
> The machine is single CPU no SMP.
> It hangs with or without X when i hangup the ippp0 interface.
> One of the scripts that run when the line is hung up may do a ifconfig
> ippp0 down afterwards which could be the actual
It works for me.
With and without the divert module loaded.
Thanks a lot
Gerold
Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> I think I found it. Could everybody who was getting the crash on ISDN line
> hangup try if the following patch fixes the problem?
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [...] the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
>
> Does this fix it for you (do a "make clean" before re-building your tree)?
Yep, that works for a modular mga.o (although it also results in
drmlib.a being installed into /lib/modules, which makes
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Gerold Jury wrote:
> I have reversed the patches part by part, the only thing that makes a
> difference is the diversion services.
> The reason for this remains unknown for me.
I think I found it. Could everybody who was getting the crash on ISDN line
hangup try if the
>
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
> > last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
> > the best I can do is make a prerelease.
>
> I just compiled that one into a 1032 kB kernel, and
Sorry for that stupid mistake.
The patches to the isdn part do not make a difference to the kernel hang
that i experienced lately.
When i reversed the patch for the mentioned files i checked the kernel
configuration and noticed that the "diversion services for isdn" where
on, a feature that i
> haven't finished this work yet. With this new work, however, the
> end-user will still load a single module (e.g., tdfx.o), just like now.
> (Loading a single kernel module is a significant win when dealing with
> end users: there is no possibility of version skew or of having two
> modules
On Tue 2 Jan 2001 08:32:45 +1100,
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST),
> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
> >>
> >> It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
> >> Makefile
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 03:51:34AM +0100, Gerold Jury wrote:
> > The ISDN changes for the HISAX drivers
> > that came in since test12 have introduced a bug that causes a
> > AIEE-something and a complete kernel hang when i hangup the isdn line.
>
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
> > last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
> > the best I can do is make a prerelease.
>
> I just
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
> last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
> the best I can do is make a prerelease.
I just compiled that one into a 1032 kB kernel, and it failed to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm using the hisax driver too (build in), and it works perfectly for
> me.
I've also seen my machine die on taking down the ippp0 interface
("service isdn stop") - not on hanging up ("isdnctrl hangup ippp0").
I keep forgetting to investigate, because it's extremely
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 03:51:34AM +0100, Gerold Jury wrote:
> The ISDN changes for the HISAX drivers
> that came in since test12 have introduced a bug that causes a
> AIEE-something and a complete kernel hang when i hangup the isdn line.
> I have reversed the patch for all occurences of
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 03:51:34AM +0100, Gerold Jury wrote:
The ISDN changes for the HISAX drivers
that came in since test12 have introduced a bug that causes a
AIEE-something and a complete kernel hang when i hangup the isdn line.
I have reversed the patch for all occurences of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm using the hisax driver too (build in), and it works perfectly for
me.
I've also seen my machine die on taking down the ippp0 interface
("service isdn stop") - not on hanging up ("isdnctrl hangup ippp0").
I keep forgetting to investigate, because it's extremely
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
the best I can do is make a prerelease.
I just compiled that one into a 1032 kB kernel, and it failed to be
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
the best I can do is make a prerelease.
I just compiled that
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 03:51:34AM +0100, Gerold Jury wrote:
The ISDN changes for the HISAX drivers
that came in since test12 have introduced a bug that causes a
AIEE-something and a complete kernel hang when i hangup the isdn line.
I also
On Tue 2 Jan 2001 08:32:45 +1100,
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST),
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
Makefile tweak), but the drm
haven't finished this work yet. With this new work, however, the
end-user will still load a single module (e.g., tdfx.o), just like now.
(Loading a single kernel module is a significant win when dealing with
end users: there is no possibility of version skew or of having two
modules that
Sorry for that stupid mistake.
The patches to the isdn part do not make a difference to the kernel hang
that i experienced lately.
When i reversed the patch for the mentioned files i checked the kernel
configuration and noticed that the "diversion services for isdn" where
on, a feature that i
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
the best I can do is make a prerelease.
I just compiled that one into a 1032 kB kernel, and it failed
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Gerold Jury wrote:
I have reversed the patches part by part, the only thing that makes a
difference is the diversion services.
The reason for this remains unknown for me.
I think I found it. Could everybody who was getting the crash on ISDN line
hangup try if the
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
Does this fix it for you (do a "make clean" before re-building your tree)?
Yep, that works for a modular mga.o (although it also results in
drmlib.a being installed into /lib/modules, which makes depmod
It works for me.
With and without the divert module loaded.
Thanks a lot
Gerold
Kai Germaschewski wrote:
I think I found it. Could everybody who was getting the crash on ISDN line
hangup try if the following patch fixes the problem?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Gerold Jury wrote (in a private message, sorry):
The machine is single CPU no SMP.
It hangs with or without X when i hangup the ippp0 interface.
One of the scripts that run when the line is hung up may do a ifconfig
ippp0 down afterwards which could be the actual reason.
The ISDN changes for the HISAX drivers
that came in since test12 have introduced a bug that causes a
AIEE-something and a complete kernel hang when i hangup the isdn line.
I have reversed the patch for all occurences of INIT_LIST_HEAD in the
isdn patch part and it works for me now.
The
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST),
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
>>
>> It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
>> Makefile tweak), but the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
>
>Does this fix it for you (do a "make
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
> >
> > It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
> > Makefile tweak), but the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
>
> Does this fix it for you (do a "make clean" before re-building your tree)?
>
>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
> last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
> the best I can do is make a prerelease.
It's even better this way. Now we kick off the new millenium with a new
kernel. :-)
--
On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
>
> It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
> Makefile tweak), but the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
Does this fix it for you (do a "make clean" before re-building your tree)?
Linus
---
On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
Makefile tweak), but the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
Does this fix it for you (do a "make clean" before re-building your tree)?
Linus
---
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
the best I can do is make a prerelease.
It's even better this way. Now we kick off the new millenium with a new
kernel. :-)
--
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
Makefile tweak), but the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
Does this fix it for you (do a "make clean" before re-building your tree)?
Linus
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST),
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
Makefile tweak), but the drm modules have unresolved symbols:
Does this fix it for you (do a "make clean"
The ISDN changes for the HISAX drivers
that came in since test12 have introduced a bug that causes a
AIEE-something and a complete kernel hang when i hangup the isdn line.
I have reversed the patch for all occurences of INIT_LIST_HEAD in the
isdn patch part and it works for me now.
The
Eric W. Biederman writes,
>Some arches have separate maintenance but I don't believe alpha is.
>Though I do believe it has a separate mailing list for alpha specific
things,
>to get better signal to noise ratio.
Great! Do you know where I can find more info about it?
--Ray
-
To unsubscribe from
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
> last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
> the best I can do is make a prerelease.
It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok. I didn't make 2.4.0 in 2000. Tough. I tried, but we had some
last-minute stuff that needed fixing (ie the dirty page lists etc), and
the best I can do is make a prerelease.
It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious
Makefile
Eric W. Biederman writes,
Some arches have separate maintenance but I don't believe alpha is.
Though I do believe it has a separate mailing list for alpha specific
things,
to get better signal to noise ratio.
Great! Do you know where I can find more info about it?
--Ray
-
To unsubscribe from
50 matches
Mail list logo
