On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:16 PM Josh Hunt wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:17 PM Josh Hunt wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:42 PM Josh Hunt wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:34 PM Thomas Gleixner
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:17 PM Josh Hunt wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:42 PM Josh Hunt wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:34 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:55 AM Thomas Gleixner
> > > > wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:42 PM Josh Hunt wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:34 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:55 AM Thomas Gleixner
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > > > > Was the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:34 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:55 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > > > Was there any progress made on debugging this issue? We are still
> > > > seeing
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:55 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > > Was there any progress made on debugging this issue? We are still
> > > seeing it on 4.19.44:
> >
> > I haven't seen anyone looking at this.
> >
> > C
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:55 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > Was there any progress made on debugging this issue? We are still
> > seeing it on 4.19.44:
>
> I haven't seen anyone looking at this.
>
> Can you please try the patch Ingo posted:
>
> https://l
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Josh Hunt wrote:
> Was there any progress made on debugging this issue? We are still
> seeing it on 4.19.44:
I haven't seen anyone looking at this.
Can you please try the patch Ingo posted:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20150501070226.gb18...@gmail.com/
and if it fixes the
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > Given the HSD143 errata and its possible relevance, have you tried
> > changing the magic number to 32, does it then still fix things?
> >
> > No real objection to the patch as such, it just needs a coherent comment
> > and a tested-by tag I
> Given the HSD143 errata and its possible relevance, have you tried
> changing the magic number to 32, does it then still fix things?
>
> No real objection to the patch as such, it just needs a coherent comment
> and a tested-by tag I think.
128 min period will affect a lot of valid use cases wi
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:59:47PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We keep seeing the following kernel warning from 3.10 kernel to 4.9
>> kernel, it exists for a rather long time.
>>
>> Google search shows there was a patch from Ingo
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:59:47PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We keep seeing the following kernel warning from 3.10 kernel to 4.9
> kernel, it exists for a rather long time.
>
> Google search shows there was a patch from Ingo:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6308681/
>
> but it do
11 matches
Mail list logo