Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter > where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:

Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: ..snip.. > > Basically, when you look at merge(1) : > > > > SYNOPSIS > >merge [ options ] file1 file2 file3 > >

Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter > where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > >Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter > > >where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told

Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...

Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter where Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: ..snip.. Basically, when you look at merge(1) : SYNOPSIS merge [ options ] file1 file2 file3 DESCRIPTION

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter where Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:

Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > >Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter > >where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > >..snip.. > >> Graydon Hoare. (By

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Adam J. Richter
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:45:38 +0200, Peter Baudis wrote: > Hello, > please do not trim the cc list so agressively. Sorry. I read the list from a web site that does not show the cc lists. I'll try to cc more people from the relevant discussions though. On the other hand, I've dropped Linus

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, please do not trim the cc list so agressively. Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... ..snip.. > Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to > user level programs for diff

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter where Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > * Ingo Molnar: > > > is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then > > once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits >

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter where Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... * Ingo Molnar: is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits (new

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, please do not trim the cc list so agressively. Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... ..snip.. Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to user level programs for diff and

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Adam J. Richter
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:45:38 +0200, Peter Baudis wrote: Hello, please do not trim the cc list so agressively. Sorry. I read the list from a web site that does not show the cc lists. I'll try to cc more people from the relevant discussions though. On the other hand, I've dropped Linus from

Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... ..snip.. Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would