On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:49:42PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:19PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Converting the smc91x driver over to NAPI would probably solve this problem,
> > but given the "vintage" of this code, I'd be more tempted by a simpler
> > po
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:19PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> Converting the smc91x driver over to NAPI would probably solve this problem,
> but given the "vintage" of this code, I'd be more tempted by a simpler
> point fix if only I could think of one.
I'm not sure if converting it to NAPI would
Hi all,
I've also stumbled over this issue with the ARM fastmodel and, somewhat
embarrassingly, blamed the model developers for the regression. I'm using
NFS and copying ~14MB file from NFS to a virtio-blk device which takes
over 20 minutes with 4cd13c21b207, but <1 min with it reverted.
I also t
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:03:28PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
This patch didn't help.
I did get some new traces though - I've attached the diff for the
trace_printks I added.
Before 4cd13c21b207:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
> This patch didn't help.
>
> I did get some new traces though - I've attached the diff for the
> trace_printks I added.
>
> Before 4cd13c21b207:
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8siaK6ZjvEwcEtOeFQzTmY0Nnc
> After 4cd13c21b207:
> https://
Hi Eric,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:09:58AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Looks like there's a few similarly named devices and drivers. Mine is
an SMSC LAN91C111 using the smc91x driver in
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c, rather than smc911x.c. So the
interrupt handler is smc_interrupt()
CONFI
>
> Looks like there's a few similarly named devices and drivers. Mine is
> an SMSC LAN91C111 using the smc91x driver in
> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c, rather than smc911x.c. So the
> interrupt handler is smc_interrupt()
>
> CONFIG_ARCH_PXA is not set, nor is SMC_USE_PXA_DMA or SMC_USE_DMA.
Hi Eric,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 06:29:33AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:40:43AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Brian,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Brian Starkey wrote:
No joy with this patch :-(
I had to add an
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:40:43AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> Brian,
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Brian Starkey wrote:
>>>
>>> No joy with this patch :-(
>>>
>>> I had to add an ioaddr argument because apparently that macro d
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:40:43AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Brian,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Brian Starkey wrote:
No joy with this patch :-(
I had to add an ioaddr argument because apparently that macro depends
on local context (yuck...), but it doesn't help my issue.
FWIW I don't see an
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:40:43AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Brian,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Brian Starkey wrote:
No joy with this patch :-(
I had to add an ioaddr argument because apparently that macro depends
on local context (yuck...), but it doesn't help my issue.
FWIW I don't
Brian,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Brian Starkey wrote:
> No joy with this patch :-(
>
> I had to add an ioaddr argument because apparently that macro depends
> on local context (yuck...), but it doesn't help my issue.
>
> FWIW I don't see any timeouts, either with or without the patch.
> (I don't know
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:29:14AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Brian Starkey wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:49:06AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Brian Starkey
wrote:
The smc91x driver does seem to have some trick
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:49:06AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Brian Starkey
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The smc91x driver does seem to have some trickiness around softirqs.
>>> I'm not familiar with net drive
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:49:06AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
The smc91x driver does seem to have some trickiness around softirqs.
I'm not familiar with net drivers, but I'll see if I can figure
anything out there.
Oh this code looks ug
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> The smc91x driver does seem to have some trickiness around softirqs.
> I'm not familiar with net drivers, but I'll see if I can figure
> anything out there.
Oh this code looks ugly :(
Do you have CONFIG_SMP=y or not ?
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:52:42AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
Hi,
I'm running an ARM FVP (virtual platform - simluated hardware), which
is failing to reach a login prompt due to extremely slow progress
during boot. systemd gives u
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running an ARM FVP (virtual platform - simluated hardware), which
> is failing to reach a login prompt due to extremely slow progress
> during boot. systemd gives up waiting for the ttyAMA0 device to
> appear, and never starts the
18 matches
Mail list logo
