On Sun 09-02-14 03:42:52, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> On 3 February 2014 18:55, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [Adding linux-mm to the CC]
>
> [...]
>
> > This means that the page has to be written back in order to be dropped.
> > How much dirty memory you have (comparing to the total size of the page
> >
On Sun 09-02-14 03:42:52, Igor Podlesny wrote:
On 3 February 2014 18:55, Michal Hocko mho...@suse.cz wrote:
[Adding linux-mm to the CC]
[...]
This means that the page has to be written back in order to be dropped.
How much dirty memory you have (comparing to the total size of the page
On 3 February 2014 18:55, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Adding linux-mm to the CC]
[...]
> This means that the page has to be written back in order to be dropped.
> How much dirty memory you have (comparing to the total size of the page
> cache)?
Not too many. May be you missed that part, but I
On 3 February 2014 18:55, Michal Hocko mho...@suse.cz wrote:
[Adding linux-mm to the CC]
[...]
This means that the page has to be written back in order to be dropped.
How much dirty memory you have (comparing to the total size of the page
cache)?
Not too many. May be you missed that
[Adding linux-mm to the CC]
On Fri 31-01-14 00:58:16, Igor Podlesny wrote:
>Hello!
>
>Probably every Linux newcomer's going to have concerns regarding
> low free memory and hear an explanation from Linux old fellows that's
> actually there's plenty of -- it's just cached, but when it's
[Adding linux-mm to the CC]
On Fri 31-01-14 00:58:16, Igor Podlesny wrote:
Hello!
Probably every Linux newcomer's going to have concerns regarding
low free memory and hear an explanation from Linux old fellows that's
actually there's plenty of -- it's just cached, but when it's needed
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Igor Podlesny wrote:
>Probably every Linux newcomer's going to have concerns regarding
> low free memory and hear an explanation from Linux old fellows that's
> actually there's plenty of -- it's just cached, but when it's needed
> for applications it's gonna be used -- on
[...]
On 1 February 2014 00:57, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> If I remember correctly, there is a sysctl for configuring how
> aggressively the system tries to retain the VFS cache, changing the
> value there might improve things for you.
Yeah, in theory. On practice I never saw a difference
On 01/31/2014 09:47 AM, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> On 31 January 2014 00:58, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> [...]
>> While I'm thinking about moving system back to XFS...
>
>Well, it helped just a bit. The whole picture remains, so it's not
> Btrfs' issue, but seemingly Linux VM's one. The problem
On 31 January 2014 00:58, Igor Podlesny wrote:
[...]
> While I'm thinking about moving system back to XFS...
Well, it helped just a bit. The whole picture remains, so it's not
Btrfs' issue, but seemingly Linux VM's one. The problem can be briefly
described as "if allowed to swap (swappiness
On 01/31/2014 09:47 AM, Igor Podlesny wrote:
On 31 January 2014 00:58, Igor Podlesny for.poige+li...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
While I'm thinking about moving system back to XFS...
Well, it helped just a bit. The whole picture remains, so it's not
Btrfs' issue, but seemingly Linux VM's
[...]
On 1 February 2014 00:57, Austin S. Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
If I remember correctly, there is a sysctl for configuring how
aggressively the system tries to retain the VFS cache, changing the
value there might improve things for you.
Yeah, in theory. On practice I never
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Igor Podlesny wrote:
Probably every Linux newcomer's going to have concerns regarding
low free memory and hear an explanation from Linux old fellows that's
actually there's plenty of -- it's just cached, but when it's needed
for applications it's gonna be used -- on
On 31 January 2014 00:58, Igor Podlesny for.poige+li...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
While I'm thinking about moving system back to XFS...
Well, it helped just a bit. The whole picture remains, so it's not
Btrfs' issue, but seemingly Linux VM's one. The problem can be briefly
described as if
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Igor Podlesny wrote:
Hello!
Probably every Linux newcomer's going to have concerns regarding
low free memory and hear an explanation from Linux old fellows that's
actually there's plenty of -- it's just cached, but when it's needed
for applications it's gonna be used
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Igor Podlesny wrote:
Hello!
Probably every Linux newcomer's going to have concerns regarding
low free memory and hear an explanation from Linux old fellows that's
actually there's plenty of -- it's just cached, but when it's needed
for applications it's gonna be used
16 matches
Mail list logo
