On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 03:14:01AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on asm-generic/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.15 next-20180202]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a no
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:08:20PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 21:25:49 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 04:00:35AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > >
> > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > Seriously? Bots have
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 21:25:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 04:00:35AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> Seriously? Bots have feelings?
>
> > [auto build test ERROR on asm-generic/master]
> > [also bui
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 04:00:35AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
Seriously? Bots have feelings?
> [auto build test ERROR on asm-generic/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.15 next-20180202]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong
Hi Peter,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on asm-generic/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.15 next-20180202]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit
Hi Peter,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on asm-generic/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.15 next-20180202]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:29:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:27:50PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > I tried to clarify some of this in the spec v1.2 [0] which help formalize
> > some of
> > the techniques we used for the SMP implementation. Its probably not
> >
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 04:50:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 03:39:51PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > I could've gotten my brain in a twist or course, which isn't _that_
> > > unusual. I never seem to be able to quite remember the holes you have
> > > with ll/sc on ar
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 03:39:51PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I could've gotten my brain in a twist or course, which isn't _that_
> > unusual. I never seem to be able to quite remember the holes you have
> > with ll/sc on arm64 :-)
>
> Is smp_mb__before_atomic supposed to provide ordering guara
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:53:29PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:32:30PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:29:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:27:50PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > > > I tried to clarify some of
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:32:30PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:29:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:27:50PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > > I tried to clarify some of this in the spec v1.2 [0] which help formalize
> > > some of
> > > the
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:29:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:27:50PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > I tried to clarify some of this in the spec v1.2 [0] which help formalize
> > some of
> > the techniques we used for the SMP implementation. Its probably not
> >
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:27:50PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> I tried to clarify some of this in the spec v1.2 [0] which help formalize
> some of
> the techniques we used for the SMP implementation. Its probably not perfect,
> but I added a section "10. Multicore support" and tried to clarify
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:26:10PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:17:37PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:00:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > While looking through the qspinlock users, I stumbled upon openrisc and
> > > being curious
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:17:37PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:00:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > While looking through the qspinlock users, I stumbled upon openrisc and
> > being curious, I wanted to have a look at its memory model.
> >
> > To my surprise it
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:00:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> While looking through the qspinlock users, I stumbled upon openrisc and
> being curious, I wanted to have a look at its memory model.
>
> To my surprise it doesn't have asm/barrier.h. It does however support
> SMP. This lead me t
16 matches
Mail list logo