Re: commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f: fuse: serialize dirops by default

2016-11-10 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Nov 10 2016, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> Hi Miklos, >> >> In commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f7acad183f34db0f8781a200 you introduced a new >> FUSE_PARALLEL_DIROPS capability and bumped the kernel interface no

Re: commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f: fuse: serialize dirops by default

2016-11-10 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Nov 10 2016, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> Hi Miklos, >> >> In commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f7acad183f34db0f8781a200 you introduced a new >> FUSE_PARALLEL_DIROPS capability and bumped the kernel interface no to >> 25 - but there have been no

Re: commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f: fuse: serialize dirops by default

2016-11-10 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hi Miklos, > > In commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f7acad183f34db0f8781a200 you introduced a new > FUSE_PARALLEL_DIROPS capability and bumped the kernel interface no to > 25 - but there have been no corresponding changes to

Re: commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f: fuse: serialize dirops by default

2016-11-10 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hi Miklos, > > In commit 5c672ab3f0ee0f78f7acad183f34db0f8781a200 you introduced a new > FUSE_PARALLEL_DIROPS capability and bumped the kernel interface no to > 25 - but there have been no corresponding changes to userspace. I think