Re: cpufreq scaling appears not to work on overclocked systems

2007-07-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:16:45PM -0600, Berck E. Nash wrote:

 > I'm running a Core2 Duo 1.86GHz overclocked to 2.56GHz.  Everything is
 > normal with cpufreq scaling disabled.  With cpufreq scaling enabled in
 > the kernel, using any governor, /proc/cpuinfo indicates a maximum of the
 > rated frequency rather than the actual frequency.

FAQ.
The BIOS contains hard coded tables of frequencies.
Just because you changed the clocks on which those tables
are based doesn't mean the tables will change.

Not a bug.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: cpufreq scaling appears not to work on overclocked systems

2007-07-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:16:45PM -0600, Berck E. Nash wrote:

  I'm running a Core2 Duo 1.86GHz overclocked to 2.56GHz.  Everything is
  normal with cpufreq scaling disabled.  With cpufreq scaling enabled in
  the kernel, using any governor, /proc/cpuinfo indicates a maximum of the
  rated frequency rather than the actual frequency.

FAQ.
The BIOS contains hard coded tables of frequencies.
Just because you changed the clocks on which those tables
are based doesn't mean the tables will change.

Not a bug.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/