On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> On 7/15/20 8:51 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:34:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I just cloned the tree, seems there is compile issue that you need to
> resolve.
Fixed and force pushed.
On 7/15/20 8:51 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:34:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:06 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
this series starts to move the early init code away from requiring
KERNEL_DS to be implicitly set during early startup. It
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:34:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:06 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > this series starts to move the early init code away from requiring
> > KERNEL_DS to be implicitly set during early startup. It does so by
> > first removing legacy
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:06 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> this series starts to move the early init code away from requiring
> KERNEL_DS to be implicitly set during early startup. It does so by
> first removing legacy unused cruft, and the switches away the code
> from struct file based APIs
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:41 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:32:07PM -0700, h...@zytor.com wrote:
> > On July 9, 2020 8:17:57 AM PDT, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >this series starts to move the early init code away from requiring
> > >KERNEL_DS to
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:32:07PM -0700, h...@zytor.com wrote:
> On July 9, 2020 8:17:57 AM PDT, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >this series starts to move the early init code away from requiring
> >KERNEL_DS to be implicitly set during early startup. It does so by
> >first removing
On July 9, 2020 8:17:57 AM PDT, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>this series starts to move the early init code away from requiring
>KERNEL_DS to be implicitly set during early startup. It does so by
>first removing legacy unused cruft, and the switches away the code
>from struct file based
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:18 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> There is no really good tree for this, so if there are no objections
> I'd like to set up a new one for linux-next.
All looks good to me. I had a wish-list change for one of the patches
that I sent a reply out for, but even without that
8 matches
Mail list logo