Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> I'm terribly sorry. I didn't manage to review before leaving on > travel. I'm back next week and then I'll review, OK? Sure thing, thanks for the heads up! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> I'm terribly sorry. I didn't manage to review before leaving on > travel. I'm back next week and then I'll review, OK? Sure thing, thanks for the heads up! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> "Wolfram" == Wolfram Sang writes: >> Thanks! I'll take a look at the patches now. > Ping :) I'm terribly sorry. I didn't manage to review before leaving on travel. I'm back next week and then I'll review, OK? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> "Wolfram" == Wolfram Sang writes: >> Thanks! I'll take a look at the patches now. > Ping :) I'm terribly sorry. I didn't manage to review before leaving on travel. I'm back next week and then I'll review, OK? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> Thanks! I'll take a look at the patches now. Ping :) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> Thanks! I'll take a look at the patches now. Ping :) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> "Wolfram" == Wolfram Sang writes: >> sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received >> any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten >> corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not. > Adding Peter to CC using his latest EMail address. Thanks! I'll take a look at the patches now. > Peter, you said you wanted to update MAINTAINERs with the new address? Sorry, I forgot about it when I left on holidays. Will send now. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> "Wolfram" == Wolfram Sang writes: >> sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received >> any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten >> corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not. > Adding Peter to CC using his latest EMail address. Thanks! I'll take a look at the patches now. > Peter, you said you wanted to update MAINTAINERs with the new address? Sorry, I forgot about it when I left on holidays. Will send now. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received > any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten > corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not. Adding Peter to CC using his latest EMail address. Peter, you said you wanted to update MAINTAINERs with the new address?
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
> sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received > any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten > corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not. Adding Peter to CC using his latest EMail address. Peter, you said you wanted to update MAINTAINERs with the new address?
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
Hello, sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not. Thanks :) On Monday, June 25, 2018 6:13:00 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote: > The first two patches fix what I believe are bugs. > > The third patch add a polling mechanism for those systems where > interrupts are not available. > > All these patches have been tested on a system without interrupt, this > means that I used my third patch to validate also the other two. > I would be nice if someone can run verify this also on other system, > perhaps with interrupts. If you consider it a useful information, I'm not > using devicetree for this installation. -- Federico Vaga [BE-CO-HT]
Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
Hello, sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not. Thanks :) On Monday, June 25, 2018 6:13:00 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote: > The first two patches fix what I believe are bugs. > > The third patch add a polling mechanism for those systems where > interrupts are not available. > > All these patches have been tested on a system without interrupt, this > means that I used my third patch to validate also the other two. > I would be nice if someone can run verify this also on other system, > perhaps with interrupts. If you consider it a useful information, I'm not > using devicetree for this installation. -- Federico Vaga [BE-CO-HT]
