2017-03-20 19:13 GMT+09:00 Will Deacon :
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:37:55AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> > Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
>> > > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today
2017-03-20 19:13 GMT+09:00 Will Deacon :
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:37:55AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> > Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
>> > > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
>> >
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:37:55AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > > it was brought up again just before I sent my
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:37:55AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > > it was brought up again just before I sent my
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > it was brought up again just before I sent my patch. I just want to
> > point out that 9442211 doesn't address
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > it was brought up again just before I sent my patch. I just want to
> > point out that 9442211 doesn't address
Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> it was brought up again just before I sent my patch. I just want to
> point out that 9442211 doesn't address arm, arc, and sh and they will
> still not have a functional rpm
Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> it was brought up again just before I sent my patch. I just want to
> point out that 9442211 doesn't address arm, arc, and sh and they will
> still not have a functional rpm
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 11:59:22PM +, Tom Rini wrote:
> On some architectures, such as arm64, KBUILD_IMAGE is not a full path
> but instead just the build target. The builddeb script handles this
> case correctly today and will try arch/$ARCH/boot/$KBUILD_IMAGE so we
> can just borrow that
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 11:59:22PM +, Tom Rini wrote:
> On some architectures, such as arm64, KBUILD_IMAGE is not a full path
> but instead just the build target. The builddeb script handles this
> case correctly today and will try arch/$ARCH/boot/$KBUILD_IMAGE so we
> can just borrow that
10 matches
Mail list logo