Hi David,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:49:09 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > What exactly are "these patches" so that I can remove them from my copy
> > of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released
> > in the next
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> What exactly are "these patches" so that I can remove them from my copy
> of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released
> in the next hour or so).
>
[nacked]
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.
> > The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is
> > meaningless.
>
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
> I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.
> The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is
> meaningless.
>
> This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end
> of
On 03/20/13 11:56, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c: In function 'merge_note_headers_elf64':
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: error: 'VMCOREINFO_NOTE_NAME' undeclared (first use
>> in this function)
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> on x86_64:
>
> fs/proc/vmcore.c: In function 'merge_note_headers_elf64':
> fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: error: 'VMCOREINFO_NOTE_NAME' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
> fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
>
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote:
on x86_64:
fs/proc/vmcore.c: In function 'merge_note_headers_elf64':
fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: error: 'VMCOREINFO_NOTE_NAME' undeclared (first use
in this function)
fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
On 03/20/13 11:56, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote:
on x86_64:
fs/proc/vmcore.c: In function 'merge_note_headers_elf64':
fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: error: 'VMCOREINFO_NOTE_NAME' undeclared (first use
in this function)
fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: note: each
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.
The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is
meaningless.
This comes from vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end
of ELF
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes rient...@google.com
wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.
The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
What exactly are these patches so that I can remove them from my copy
of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released
in the next hour or so).
[nacked]
Hi David,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:49:09 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes rient...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
What exactly are these patches so that I can remove them from my copy
of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released
in
12 matches
Mail list logo
