Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2019-07-01 Thread Enric Balletbo i Serra
Hi Sebastian, In case is not too late for you. Otherwise we will need to wait for next cycle. The following changes since commit a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9: Linux 5.2-rc1 (2019-05-19 15:47:09 -0700) are available in the Git repository at:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2019-06-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Enric, On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:56:56 +0200 Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: > > Hmm, I just applied this patch on top of linux-next and it build with > allmodconfig on x86_64 > > I am wondering if the build was done without this commit, which is in > chrome-platform for-next branch. Could be

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2019-06-28 Thread Enric Balletbo i Serra
Hi, On 28/6/19 17:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:03:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >> allmodconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/power/supply/wilco-charger.c: In function

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2019-06-28 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:03:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/power/supply/wilco-charger.c: In function 'wilco_charge_get_property': >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-21 Thread Belisko Marek
Adding Tony to CC On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell >> >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-21 Thread Belisko Marek
Adding Tony to CC On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell >>

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Belisko, On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:12:06 +0200 Belisko Marek wrote: > > I did test it and it builds fine (multi_v7_defconfig). My HEAD is on > dad463bdcbb41dfd17c799a5653bb57f185f2c76 That is next-20151002 which does not contain the broken commit. I am using the battery tree that was included

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-08 Thread Belisko Marek
Hi Stephen, On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > >> > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-08 Thread Belisko Marek
Hi Stephen, On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > >>

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Belisko, On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:12:06 +0200 Belisko Marek wrote: > > I did test it and it builds fine (multi_v7_defconfig). My HEAD is on > dad463bdcbb41dfd17c799a5653bb57f185f2c76 That is next-20151002 which does not contain the broken commit. I am using the battery

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > ERROR (phandle_references):

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label > "twl4030_madc" > ERROR: Input tree has

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2015-10-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label > "twl4030_madc" >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2012-07-15 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi Stephen, On 07/16/2012 01:09 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Anton, > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `charger_manager_probe': > charger-manager.c:(.text+0x11d61a): undefined reference

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

2012-07-15 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi Stephen, On 07/16/2012 01:09 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Anton, After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/built-in.o: In function `charger_manager_probe': charger-manager.c:(.text+0x11d61a): undefined reference to