Hi Sebastian,
In case is not too late for you. Otherwise we will need to wait for next cycle.
The following changes since commit a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9:
Linux 5.2-rc1 (2019-05-19 15:47:09 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
Hi Enric,
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:56:56 +0200 Enric Balletbo i Serra
wrote:
>
> Hmm, I just applied this patch on top of linux-next and it build with
> allmodconfig on x86_64
>
> I am wondering if the build was done without this commit, which is in
> chrome-platform for-next branch. Could be
Hi,
On 28/6/19 17:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:03:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/power/supply/wilco-charger.c: In function
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:03:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/power/supply/wilco-charger.c: In function 'wilco_charge_get_property':
>
Adding Tony to CC
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> >
Adding Tony to CC
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>>
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:26:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > >
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:04:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hi Belisko,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:12:06 +0200 Belisko Marek wrote:
>
> I did test it and it builds fine (multi_v7_defconfig). My HEAD is on
> dad463bdcbb41dfd17c799a5653bb57f185f2c76
That is next-20151002 which does not contain the broken commit. I am
using the battery tree that was included
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> >
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> >
>>
Hi Belisko,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:12:06 +0200 Belisko Marek wrote:
>
> I did test it and it builds fine (multi_v7_defconfig). My HEAD is on
> dad463bdcbb41dfd17c799a5653bb57f185f2c76
That is next-20151002 which does not contain the broken commit. I am
using the battery
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR (phandle_references):
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label
> "twl4030_madc"
> ERROR: Input tree has
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label
> "twl4030_madc"
>
Hi Stephen,
On 07/16/2012 01:09 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `charger_manager_probe':
> charger-manager.c:(.text+0x11d61a): undefined reference
Hi Stephen,
On 07/16/2012 01:09 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Anton,
After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `charger_manager_probe':
charger-manager.c:(.text+0x11d61a): undefined reference to
20 matches
Mail list logo