On 04/05/2013 03:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
Interesting. I rebased my arm-next branch based on 3.9-rc5
with some Rob's + one Arnd patch from arm-soc - clksrc/cleanup branch.
I will fix my arm-next branch.
The for-next branch in arm-soc is not
On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
> > > Interesting. I rebased my arm-next branch based on 3.9-rc5
> > > with some Rob's + one Arnd patch from arm-soc - clksrc/cleanup branch.
> > >
> > > I will fix my arm-next branch.
> >
> > The for-next branch in arm-soc is not stable, you should
On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/4/5 Stephen Rothwell
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-spear/spear13xx.c between commit c79e33b3e828 ("ARM:
> > smp_twd: convert to use CLKSRC_OF init") from the
On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
2013/4/5 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear13xx.c between commit c79e33b3e828 (ARM:
smp_twd: convert to use CLKSRC_OF init) from the
On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
Interesting. I rebased my arm-next branch based on 3.9-rc5
with some Rob's + one Arnd patch from arm-soc - clksrc/cleanup branch.
I will fix my arm-next branch.
The for-next branch in arm-soc is not stable, you should never base
On 04/05/2013 03:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
Interesting. I rebased my arm-next branch based on 3.9-rc5
with some Rob's + one Arnd patch from arm-soc - clksrc/cleanup branch.
I will fix my arm-next branch.
The for-next branch in arm-soc is not
Hi Michal,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 07:52:34 +0200 Michal Simek wrote:
>
> 2013/4/5 Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > BTW, that xilinx tree commit has no "Signed-off-by" for the committer ...
>
> Interesting that you can't see Rob's Signed-off-by line.
Rob was the author, you were the committer ...
$ git
Hi all,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:33:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-spear/spear13xx.c between commit c79e33b3e828 ("ARM:
> smp_twd: convert to use CLKSRC_OF init") from the xilinx tree and commit
> 2b9c613c4ee1
Hi all,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:33:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear13xx.c between commit c79e33b3e828 (ARM:
smp_twd: convert to use CLKSRC_OF init) from the xilinx tree and commit
Hi Michal,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 07:52:34 +0200 Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote:
2013/4/5 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
BTW, that xilinx tree commit has no Signed-off-by for the committer ...
Interesting that you can't see Rob's Signed-off-by line.
Rob was the author, you were
10 matches
Mail list logo