Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[James Morris]

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi James,
> 
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:51:53 +1000 (AEST) James Morris  
> wrote:
> >
> > That's odd, my next-general branch is merged to Linus.
> 
> The security tree in linux-next is
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git#next-testing
> 
> which has the efi-lock-down tree merged into it.

Ahh, I see.  I'll rebase next-testing.

-- 
James Morris

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[James Morris]

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi James,
> 
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:51:53 +1000 (AEST) James Morris  
> wrote:
> >
> > That's odd, my next-general branch is merged to Linus.
> 
> The security tree in linux-next is
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git#next-testing
> 
> which has the efi-lock-down tree merged into it.

Ahh, I see.  I'll rebase next-testing.

-- 
James Morris

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi James,

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:51:53 +1000 (AEST) James Morris  wrote:
>
> That's odd, my next-general branch is merged to Linus.

The security tree in linux-next is

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git#next-testing

which has the efi-lock-down tree merged into it.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgp6JOJRcC1_1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi James,

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:51:53 +1000 (AEST) James Morris  wrote:
>
> That's odd, my next-general branch is merged to Linus.

The security tree in linux-next is

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git#next-testing

which has the efi-lock-down tree merged into it.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgp6JOJRcC1_1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[James Morris]

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:22:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell  
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:34:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> > > 
> > >   drivers/scsi/eata.c
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >   5b76b160badb ("scsi: Lock down the eata driver")
> > > 
> > > from the efi-lock-down tree and commit:
> > > 
> > >   6b1745caa14a ("scsi: eata: eata-pio: Deprecate legacy EATA drivers")
> > > 
> > > from the scsi-mkp tree.
> > > 
> > > I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > > when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly complex conflicts.  
> > 
> > This is now a conflict between the efi-lock-down tree and Linus' tree.
> 
> This is now a conflict between the security tree and Linus' tree.

That's odd, my next-general branch is merged to Linus.

-- 
James Morris

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[James Morris]

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:22:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell  
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:34:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> > > 
> > >   drivers/scsi/eata.c
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >   5b76b160badb ("scsi: Lock down the eata driver")
> > > 
> > > from the efi-lock-down tree and commit:
> > > 
> > >   6b1745caa14a ("scsi: eata: eata-pio: Deprecate legacy EATA drivers")
> > > 
> > > from the scsi-mkp tree.
> > > 
> > > I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > > when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly complex conflicts.  
> > 
> > This is now a conflict between the efi-lock-down tree and Linus' tree.
> 
> This is now a conflict between the security tree and Linus' tree.

That's odd, my next-general branch is merged to Linus.

-- 
James Morris

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:22:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:34:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/scsi/eata.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   5b76b160badb ("scsi: Lock down the eata driver")
> > 
> > from the efi-lock-down tree and commit:
> > 
> >   6b1745caa14a ("scsi: eata: eata-pio: Deprecate legacy EATA drivers")
> > 
> > from the scsi-mkp tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > particularly complex conflicts.  
> 
> This is now a conflict between the efi-lock-down tree and Linus' tree.

This is now a conflict between the security tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpYavBe_Q9hY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:22:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:34:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/scsi/eata.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   5b76b160badb ("scsi: Lock down the eata driver")
> > 
> > from the efi-lock-down tree and commit:
> > 
> >   6b1745caa14a ("scsi: eata: eata-pio: Deprecate legacy EATA drivers")
> > 
> > from the scsi-mkp tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > particularly complex conflicts.  
> 
> This is now a conflict between the efi-lock-down tree and Linus' tree.

This is now a conflict between the security tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpYavBe_Q9hY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:34:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/scsi/eata.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   5b76b160badb ("scsi: Lock down the eata driver")
> 
> from the efi-lock-down tree and commit:
> 
>   6b1745caa14a ("scsi: eata: eata-pio: Deprecate legacy EATA drivers")
> 
> from the scsi-mkp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the efi-lock-down tree and Linus' tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpEvOeeoviG8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the efi-lock-down tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:34:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/scsi/eata.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   5b76b160badb ("scsi: Lock down the eata driver")
> 
> from the efi-lock-down tree and commit:
> 
>   6b1745caa14a ("scsi: eata: eata-pio: Deprecate legacy EATA drivers")
> 
> from the scsi-mkp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the efi-lock-down tree and Linus' tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpEvOeeoviG8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature