On 8/26/05, Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > Stack is hand-copied from the dead box's console.
> >
> > [] die+0xe4/0x170
> > [] do_trap+0x7f/0xc0
> > [] do_invalid_op+0xa3/0xb0
> > [] error_code+0x4f/0x54
> > [] kfree_skbmem+0xb/0x20
> > []
Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> Stack is hand-copied from the dead box's console.
>
> [] die+0xe4/0x170
> [] do_trap+0x7f/0xc0
> [] do_invalid_op+0xa3/0xb0
> [] error_code+0x4f/0x54
> [] kfree_skbmem+0xb/0x20
> [] __kfree_skb+0x5f/0xf0
> [] tcp_clean_rtx_queue+0x16a/0x470
> [] tcp_ack+0xf6/0x360
> []
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:02:01PM +0200, Sven Schuster wrote:
>
> Hi Harald,
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:55:50PM +0200, Harald Welte told us:
> > Is it true that PeerGuardian is a proprietary application? I'm not
> > going to debug this problem using a proprietary ip_queue program, sorry.
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:02:01PM +0200, Sven Schuster wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:55:50PM +0200, Harald Welte told us:
Is it true that PeerGuardian is a proprietary application? I'm not
going to debug this problem using a proprietary ip_queue program, sorry.
sorry
Alessandro Suardi wrote:
Stack is hand-copied from the dead box's console.
[c0103714] die+0xe4/0x170
[c010381f] do_trap+0x7f/0xc0
[c0103b33] do_invalid_op+0xa3/0xb0
[c0102faf] error_code+0x4f/0x54
[c02eb05b] kfree_skbmem+0xb/0x20
[c02eb0cf] __kfree_skb+0x5f/0xf0
[c031304a]
On 8/26/05, Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alessandro Suardi wrote:
Stack is hand-copied from the dead box's console.
[c0103714] die+0xe4/0x170
[c010381f] do_trap+0x7f/0xc0
[c0103b33] do_invalid_op+0xa3/0xb0
[c0102faf] error_code+0x4f/0x54
[c02eb05b] kfree_skbmem+0xb/0x20
Hi Harald,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:55:50PM +0200, Harald Welte told us:
> Is it true that PeerGuardian is a proprietary application? I'm not
> going to debug this problem using a proprietary ip_queue program, sorry.
sorry to jump in here, but I took a quick look at PeerGuardian,
according
On 8/25/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:39:02PM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > Howdy, and excuse me for crossposting - feel free to zap CC to
> > unrelated, if any, mailing lists.
> >
> > just gave PeerGuardian a spin on my eDonkey home box and
> >
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:39:02PM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> Howdy, and excuse me for crossposting - feel free to zap CC to
> unrelated, if any, mailing lists.
>
> just gave PeerGuardian a spin on my eDonkey home box and
> said box didn't last half a day before oopsing in
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:39:02PM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
Howdy, and excuse me for crossposting - feel free to zap CC to
unrelated, if any, mailing lists.
just gave PeerGuardian a spin on my eDonkey home box and
said box didn't last half a day before oopsing in netlink/nf/tcp
On 8/25/05, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:39:02PM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
Howdy, and excuse me for crossposting - feel free to zap CC to
unrelated, if any, mailing lists.
just gave PeerGuardian a spin on my eDonkey home box and
said box
Hi Harald,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:55:50PM +0200, Harald Welte told us:
Is it true that PeerGuardian is a proprietary application? I'm not
going to debug this problem using a proprietary ip_queue program, sorry.
sorry to jump in here, but I took a quick look at PeerGuardian,
according to
12 matches
Mail list logo
