Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-09 Thread Paul Turner
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul Turner wrote: > >> Peter: >> The rebase to tip/master made interdiff angry enough that it wasn't >> producing the right relative diffs for your stack. Sorry :( > > Find below the diff between the two series, using 'quilt > snapshot'

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-09 Thread Paul Turner
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Thanks Ingo! Paul, > >> tip/kernel/sched/fair.c | 28 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> Index: tip/kernel/sched/fair.c >>

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-09 Thread Paul Turner
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: Thanks Ingo! Paul, tip/kernel/sched/fair.c | 28 ++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Index:

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-09 Thread Paul Turner
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Paul Turner p...@google.com wrote: Peter: The rebase to tip/master made interdiff angry enough that it wasn't producing the right relative diffs for your stack. Sorry :( Find below the diff between the two series,

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-08 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: Thanks Ingo! Paul, > tip/kernel/sched/fair.c | 28 ++-- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > Index: tip/kernel/sched/fair.c > === >

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-08 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: Thanks Ingo! Paul, tip/kernel/sched/fair.c | 28 ++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Index: tip/kernel/sched/fair.c === ---

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul Turner wrote: > Peter: > The rebase to tip/master made interdiff angry enough that it wasn't > producing the right relative diffs for your stack. Sorry :( Find below the diff between the two series, using 'quilt snapshot' and 'quilt diff --snapshot'. One quick stylistic note: instead

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul Turner p...@google.com wrote: Peter: The rebase to tip/master made interdiff angry enough that it wasn't producing the right relative diffs for your stack. Sorry :( Find below the diff between the two series, using 'quilt snapshot' and 'quilt diff --snapshot'. One quick stylistic

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-05 Thread Paul Turner
I've rebased this to tip/master and pushed some minor updates (most notable: rounding down in decay_load). Tree is at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/pjt/sched.git;a=summary (branch: load-tracking) If you prefer raw patches there's a quilt series at:

Re: sched: per-entity load-tracking

2012-10-05 Thread Paul Turner
I've rebased this to tip/master and pushed some minor updates (most notable: rounding down in decay_load). Tree is at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/pjt/sched.git;a=summary (branch: load-tracking) If you prefer raw patches there's a quilt series at: