> David Schwartz пишет:
> > You have a misunderstanding about the semantics of 'sendfile'.
> The 'sendfile' function is just a more efficient version of a
> read followed by a write. If you did a read followed by a write,
> it would block as well (in the read).
> >
> > DS
> sendfile function
David Schwartz пишет:
You have a misunderstanding about the semantics of 'sendfile'.
The 'sendfile' function is just a more efficient version of a
read followed by a write. If you did a read followed by a write,
it would block as well (in the read).
DS
sendfile function is not just
David Schwartz пишет:
You have a misunderstanding about the semantics of 'sendfile'. The 'sendfile'
function is just a more efficient version of a read followed by a write. If you
did a read followed by a write, it would block as well (in the read).
DS
sendfile function is not just a more
David Miller wrote:
From: voron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:13:27 +0300
As I see, nonblocking mode is enabled - sendfile sends less than asked.
The socket is marked as non-blocking, but the disk I/O is not.
It's blocking on the disk I/O not the socket part of the
> As I see, nonblocking mode is enabled - sendfile sends less than asked.
> But 2G via single 30 seconds sendfile call - this is blocking call. How
> can I avoid that? I prefer sendfile as fastest way to send file
> content to network socket. The problem with sendfile block on
>
From: voron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:13:27 +0300
> As I see, nonblocking mode is enabled - sendfile sends less than asked.
The socket is marked as non-blocking, but the disk I/O is not.
It's blocking on the disk I/O not the socket part of the operation.
-
To unsubscribe
From: voron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:13:27 +0300
As I see, nonblocking mode is enabled - sendfile sends less than asked.
The socket is marked as non-blocking, but the disk I/O is not.
It's blocking on the disk I/O not the socket part of the operation.
-
To unsubscribe from
As I see, nonblocking mode is enabled - sendfile sends less than asked.
But 2G via single 30 seconds sendfile call - this is blocking call. How
can I avoid that? I prefer sendfile as fastest way to send file
content to network socket. The problem with sendfile block on
nonblocking
David Miller wrote:
From: voron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:13:27 +0300
As I see, nonblocking mode is enabled - sendfile sends less than asked.
The socket is marked as non-blocking, but the disk I/O is not.
It's blocking on the disk I/O not the socket part of the
David Schwartz пишет:
You have a misunderstanding about the semantics of 'sendfile'. The 'sendfile'
function is just a more efficient version of a read followed by a write. If you
did a read followed by a write, it would block as well (in the read).
DS
sendfile function is not just a more
10 matches
Mail list logo
