On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 5:30 PM Steffen Vogel wrote:
>
> For those who are interested. Rspamd, by default, includes the sender
> address into the list of signed headers:
Ugh. That's just broken.
> There is RFC6377 which discusses this problem. On possible solution is
> a mailing list service
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 5:30 PM Steffen Vogel wrote:
>
> For those who are interested. Rspamd, by default, includes the sender
> address into the list of signed headers:
Ugh. That's just broken.
> There is RFC6377 which discusses this problem. On possible solution is
> a mailing list service
Hi Linus,
Thanks! Its hopefully fixed now.
For those who are interested. Rspamd, by default, includes the sender
address into the list of signed headers:
https://www.rspamd.com/doc/modules/dkim_signing.html#default-sign_headers-after-173
> End result: the DKIM signature is guaranteed to fail
Hi Linus,
Thanks! Its hopefully fixed now.
For those who are interested. Rspamd, by default, includes the sender
address into the list of signed headers:
https://www.rspamd.com/doc/modules/dkim_signing.html#default-sign_headers-after-173
> End result: the DKIM signature is guaranteed to fail
[ This is not about your patch series per se, only about your email settings ]
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 3:20 PM Steffen Vogel wrote:
>
> This is my first series of patches for the Linux kernel.
> I started by familiarizing myself with coding style and
> satisfying my inner OCD by cleaning the
[ This is not about your patch series per se, only about your email settings ]
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 3:20 PM Steffen Vogel wrote:
>
> This is my first series of patches for the Linux kernel.
> I started by familiarizing myself with coding style and
> satisfying my inner OCD by cleaning the
6 matches
Mail list logo
