On 1/10/21 8:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20210108:
>
on x86_64:
ld: drivers/net/ipa/ipa_main.o: in function `ipa_remove':
ipa_main.c:(.text+0x20d): undefined reference to `rproc_put'
ld: drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.o: in function `ipa_mem_init':
Hi all,
Changes since 20210108:
The btrfs tree gained a conflict against the btrfs-fixes tree.
The drm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20210107.
The amdgpu tree lost its build failure.
The drm-intel tree gained a build failure from merging the drm tree,
so I
Hi all,
Changes since 20190110:
New tree: cpufreq-arm
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the security
trees.
Non-merge commits (relative to
On 01/10/18 22:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180110:
>
on i386 or x86_64:
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c: In function 'mtu3_suspend':
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c:462:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'ssusb_wakeup_set'
On 01/10/18 22:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180110:
>
on i386 or x86_64:
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c: In function 'mtu3_suspend':
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c:462:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'ssusb_wakeup_set'
Hi all,
Changes since 20180110:
The net-next tree lost its build failure but gained another due to an
interaction with the net tree for which I reverted a commit.
The kspp tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied
a
Hi all,
Changes since 20180110:
The net-next tree lost its build failure but gained another due to an
interaction with the net tree for which I reverted a commit.
The kspp tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied
a
Hi all,
Changes since 20170110:
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2646
3419 files changed, 102456 insertions(+), 57379 deletions(-)
I have created today's linux-next tree at
Hi all,
Changes since 20170110:
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2646
3419 files changed, 102456 insertions(+), 57379 deletions(-)
I have created today's linux-next tree at
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:37:53AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/10/13 22:19, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130110:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> CC kernel/rcutree.o
> kernel/rcutree.c: In function 'record_gp_stall_check_time':
> kernel/rcutree.c:808:2:
On 01/10/13 22:19, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130110:
>
on x86_64:
CC kernel/rcutree.o
kernel/rcutree.c: In function 'record_gp_stall_check_time':
kernel/rcutree.c:808:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check'
On 01/10/13 22:19, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130110:
on x86_64:
CC kernel/rcutree.o
kernel/rcutree.c: In function 'record_gp_stall_check_time':
kernel/rcutree.c:808:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check'
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:37:53AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 01/10/13 22:19, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130110:
on x86_64:
CC kernel/rcutree.o
kernel/rcutree.c: In function 'record_gp_stall_check_time':
kernel/rcutree.c:808:2: error: implicit
Hi all,
Changes since 20130110:
Dropped tree: samung (many conflicts)
The ia64 tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130110.
The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch
and another which I just left for today.
The v4l-dvb tree gained a build
Hi all,
Changes since 20130110:
Dropped tree: samung (many conflicts)
The ia64 tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130110.
The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch
and another which I just left for today.
The v4l-dvb tree gained a build
15 matches
Mail list logo
