Re: linux-next: Tree for May 22 (net/psample/)

2020-05-22 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/22/20 5:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200521: > on i386: ../net/psample/psample.c: In function ‘__psample_ip_tun_to_nlattr’: ../net/psample/psample.c:216:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ip_tunnel_info_opts’; did you mean

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2020-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200521: My fixes tree contains: cd2b06ec45d6 ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") The ext4 tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. The jc_docs tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. The drm-msm tree still had its build failure so I

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2019-05-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190521: The imx-mxs tree lost its build failure. The scsi tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The pidfd tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the pidfd tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1426

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2017-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170519: The netfilter tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20170519. The selinux tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The tip tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2017-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170519: The netfilter tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20170519. The selinux tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The tip tree gained a

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 22 (build failure in i915_gem_gtt.c)

2015-05-22 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 06:09:40PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150521: > > The device-mapper tree gained a build failure so I used the version > from next-20150521. > > The driver-core tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix > patch. > >

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2015-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150521: The device-mapper tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150521. The driver-core tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5332 4735 files changed, 245341 insertions(+),

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2015-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150521: The device-mapper tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150521. The driver-core tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5332 4735 files changed, 245341 insertions(+),

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 22 (build failure in i915_gem_gtt.c)

2015-05-22 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 06:09:40PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150521: The device-mapper tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150521. The driver-core tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2014-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140521: My fixes tree contains: powerpc/ppc64: Allow allmodconfig to build (finally !) The renesas tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The pci tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140521. The net-next tree lost its build

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2014-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140521: My fixes tree contains: powerpc/ppc64: Allow allmodconfig to build (finally !) The renesas tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The pci tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140521. The net-next tree lost its build

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2013-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130521: The crypto tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20130520. The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the pm tree. The tty tree lost its build failure. The vhost tree gained a conflict against the rr-fixes tree and a build failure

linux-next: Tree for May 22

2013-05-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130521: The crypto tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20130520. The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the pm tree. The tty tree lost its build failure. The vhost tree gained a conflict against the rr-fixes tree and a build failure