Il 2021-06-29 01:00 Chris Murphy ha scritto:
Pretty sure it's fixed since 4.14.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/10/23
Hi Chris, the headline states "harden against duplicate fsid". Does it
means that the issue is "only" less likely or it was really solved?
It's not inherently slow, it's a
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:33 AM Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
> Il 2021-06-28 05:28 Stuart D Gathman ha scritto:
> > Yes. I like the checksums in metadata feature for enhanced integrity
> > checking.
>
> Until recently btrfs has issue when a LVM snapshot was mounted. It is
> now solved?
Pretty sure
Il 2021-06-28 05:28 Stuart D Gathman ha scritto:
Yes. I like the checksums in metadata feature for enhanced integrity
checking.
Until recently btrfs has issue when a LVM snapshot was mounted. It is
now solved?
It seems too complicated to have anytime soon - but when a filesystem
detects
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, heming.z...@suse.com wrote:
In my opinion, the using style of btrfs by many users are same as ext4/xfs.
Yes. I like the checksums in metadata feature for enhanced integrity
checking.
It seems too complicated to have anytime soon - but when a filesystem
detects
On 6/25/21 6:57 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 25. 06. 21 v 7:28 heming.z...@suse.com napsal(a):
Hello Zdenek & David,
From URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs
The btrfs becomes default filesystem for desktops.
Do we have any plan to add btrfs code for scripts/fsadm.sh?
If the answer is
Dne 25. 06. 21 v 7:28 heming.z...@suse.com napsal(a):
Hello Zdenek & David,
From URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs
The btrfs becomes default filesystem for desktops.
Do we have any plan to add btrfs code for scripts/fsadm.sh?
If the answer is yes. I could share a suse special patch,
Hello Zdenek & David,
From URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs
The btrfs becomes default filesystem for desktops.
Do we have any plan to add btrfs code for scripts/fsadm.sh?
If the answer is yes. I could share a suse special patch, this patch
had been run about 4 years in suse products.
