Re: [linux-lvm] LVM says physical volumes are missing, but they are not

2016-05-30 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/30/2016 04:15 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Hi > > Please provide full 'vgchage -ay -' trace of such activation > command. > > Also specify which version of lvm2 is in use by your distro. 2.02.133-1ubuntu10. I ended up fixing it by doing

[linux-lvm] Mirror allocation policy

2021-01-05 Thread Phillip Susi
I seem to remember ( and found some references on the web ) that there used to be a way to change the allocation policy when creating a mirror from the default of strict ( must use different pvs ), but I can't find a mention of strict in the man pages these days. I did see the option for --alloc

Re: [linux-lvm] Mirror allocation policy

2021-01-05 Thread Phillip Susi
Alasdair G Kergon writes: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:31:00PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: >> How can I forge it to make the mirror on a single pv? > > If --alloc anywhere isn't doing the trick, you'll need to dig into > the - output to try to understand why. There m

Re: [linux-lvm] Mirror allocation policy

2021-01-06 Thread Phillip Susi
Alasdair G Kergon writes: > So despite that, it's not letting you have the 'anywhere' for the log > part of the allocation. Based on the number of extents it said it was looking for, I didn't think it was the log that it couldn't place. > However, for what you are doing, maybe you don't need

Re: [linux-lvm] how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?

2021-12-21 Thread Phillip Susi
Tomas Dalebjörk writes: > hi > > I think I didn’t explain this clear enough > Allthe lvm data is present in the snapshot that I provision from our backup > system > I can guarantee that! > > If I just mount that snapshot from our backup system, it works perfectly well > > so we don’t need

Re: [linux-lvm] how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?

2021-12-20 Thread Phillip Susi
I'm confused. What exactly are you trying to do here? I can't think of any reason why you would want to copy a snapshot lv to a file then try to loop mount it. Tomas Dalebjörk writes: > Hi, > > I am trying to understand how to convert a disk containing snapshot data. > This is how I tested

Re: [linux-lvm] Swapping LLVM drive

2023-09-08 Thread Phillip Susi
Stuart D Gathman writes: > 1. Unnecessary copying. 2. You lose your free backup of the system on > the old drive, >which should be carefully labeled and kept handy for a year. >(After that, SSDs start to run the risk of data retention issues.) You also have unnecessary copying with

Re: [linux-lvm] Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?

2023-10-02 Thread Phillip Susi
"Brian J. Murrell" writes: > Because I need to add another member to the array that is just slightly > smaller than the existing array. It's the same sized disk as what's in > the array currently but is itself an MD array with luks, which is > reserving it's own metadata region from the total

Re: [linux-lvm] Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?

2023-10-02 Thread Phillip Susi
"Brian J. Murrell" writes: > I can shrink this array down to 3,906,886,464 without impacting the PV > (and it's contents) correct? Looks that way. That would be how much space is left in the array that is not quite enough for another 4 MiB PE. > From my calculations there is 4,022,272 bytes

Re: [linux-lvm] Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?

2023-10-02 Thread Phillip Susi
"Brian J. Murrell" writes: > Just to take advantage of MD's online/background sync to get the data > from md0 array to the md1 array. If you weren't using LVM, then that would be a good idea, but LVM can do that too. ___ linux-lvm mailing list

Re: [linux-lvm] Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?

2023-10-04 Thread Phillip Susi
"Brian J. Murrell" writes: > So just to confirm, given: > > sdc 8:32 0 3.7T 0 disk > └─md0 9:00 3.7T 0 raid1 > ├─backups-backups 253:13 0 2.5T 0 lvm >

Re: [linux-lvm] Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?

2023-10-05 Thread Phillip Susi
"Brian J. Murrell" writes: > But I did just think of the other benefit of using MD to sync the new > device and that's having a recovery path. > > That is, if I add luks-backup to /dev/md0 and then wait for it to > finish syncing, I can then shut down the machine, remove /dev/sdc from > the

Re: [linux-lvm] Swapping LLVM drive

2023-08-28 Thread Phillip Susi
Stuart D Gathman writes: > Use dd to copy the partition table (this also often contains boot code) > to the new disk on USB. > Then use dd to copy the smaller partitions (efi,boot). Now use cfdisk > to delete the 3rd partition. Expand the boot partition to 1G (you'll > thank me later). >

Re: [linux-lvm] badblocks

2023-05-22 Thread Phillip Susi
graeme vetterlein writes: > I was able to "replace" 1 broken 2TB 1 working 2TB drive with a new > 4TB drive > without any filesystem creation, copying etc, just using LVM commands: >     umount /dev/mapper/SAMSUNG_2TB-data >     umount /dev/mapper/SAMSUNG_2TB-vimage >     lvchange -an 

Re: [linux-lvm] badblocks

2023-05-22 Thread Phillip Susi
graeme vetterlein writes: > I have a desktop Linux box (Debian Sid) with a clutch of disks in it > (4 or 5)  and have mostly defined each disk as a volume group. Why? The prupose of a VG is to hold multiple PVs. > Now a key point is *some of the disks are NAS grade disks.* This means > they