Hi Finn,
On 25/09/18 11:49, Finn Thain wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Hi Finn,
has this been resolved in the meantime?
My compiler is too old (4.4.6) to be affected. Also, I didn't pursue a
patch because I don't really know how you fix this properly.
Maybe Andreas or
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Finn,
>
> has this been resolved in the meantime?
>
My compiler is too old (4.4.6) to be affected. Also, I didn't pursue a
patch because I don't really know how you fix this properly.
It seems that multiple architectures have multiple issues.
Hi Finn,
has this been resolved in the meantime?
I'm running into a little dilemma when working on yet another spin on
the RDB partition patch (the patch that just won't die): either use old
gcc 4.6.3, and lack __udivdi3 support, or new and shiny 8.10 with its
strncmp mess.
Cheers,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 12:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Firoz,
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> > System call table generation script must be run to generate
> > unistd_32.h and syscall_table.h files. This patch will have
> > changes which will invokes the script.
>
Hi Geert,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 12:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Firoz,
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> > The system call tables are in different format in all
> > architecture and it will be difficult to manually add or
> > modify the system calls in the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:06 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> The purpose of this patch series is:
> 1. We can easily add/modify/delete system call by changing entry
> in syscall.tbl file. No need to manually edit many files.
>
> 2. It is easy to unify the system call implementation across all
> the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> Added few __IGNORE* entries for seccomp, pkey_mprotect,
> pkey_alloc, pkey_free, io_pgetevents and rseq in the file
> asm/unistd.h as it is correct to keep __IGNORE* entry in
> non uapi header asm/unistd.h while uapi/asm/unistd.h must
> hold
Hi Firoz,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> System call table generation script must be run to generate
> unistd_32.h and syscall_table.h files. This patch will have
> changes which will invokes the script.
>
> This patch will generate unistd_32.h and syscall_table.h
> files by
Hi Firoz,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> The system call tables are in different format in all
> architecture and it will be difficult to manually add or
> modify the system calls in the respective files. To make
> it easy by keeping a script and which'll generate the
>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:06 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
>no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
until
(scripts/checkpatch.pl would have told you)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:06 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
> system call.
>
> One of patch in this
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:06 PM Firoz Khan wrote:
> The system call table entries are present in syscalltable.S. One of
> the patch in this patch series will auto-generate the system call
> table entries using the system call table generation script and
> which'll replace the existig table file.
12 matches
Mail list logo