Hi Geert,
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 20:17, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Firoz,
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:06 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
> > The purpose of this patch series is, we can easily add/modify/delete
> > system call table support by changing entry in syscall.tbl file
> > instead of
Hi Linus,
Can you please pull the m68knommu git tree, for-next branch.
Only a single change to fix an out of bounds array access when
parsing boot command line.
Regards
Greg
The following changes since commit 35a7f35ad1b150ddf59a41dcac7b2fa32982be0e:
Linux 4.19-rc8 (2018-10-15
Hi Arnd,
On 28/10/18 1:54 am, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 5:02 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Arnd,
https://lwn.net/Articles/769468/ wrote:
For example, the m68k architecture uses a number of internal APIs that no
other
architecture needs at this point; removing that
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >
> > > The example I gave was GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS on m68, which is
> > > supported on most but not all machines there.
> >
> > That suggests that the removal of just those machines would suffice
> > (as opposed to the removal of the entire
Hi Linus,
The following changes since commit 5b394b2ddf0347bef56e50c69a58773c94343ff3:
Linux 4.19-rc1 (2018-08-26 14:11:59 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git
tags/m68k-for-v4.20-tag1
for you to fetch
[ Wow, I hadn't expected such a heated discussion, I just wanted to
know which code
needed fixes... ]
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 8:00 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 5:02 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > wrote:
> > >
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 5:02 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/769468/ wrote:
> > > For example, the m68k architecture uses a number of internal APIs that
> > > no other
> > > architecture needs at this
