On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 20:28 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Anything happening here ? We're getting that warning on ppc too
> despite
> > the fact that we use socketcall like x86... Should checksyscall be
> made
> > smarter or the syscall just removed from x86 ? :-)
>
> I think it's better to trap
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:20:33 +1100
> Anything happening here ? We're getting that warning on ppc too despite
> the fact that we use socketcall like x86... Should checksyscall be made
> smarter or the syscall just removed from x86 ? :-)
I think it's better to trap
> It's also rather inconsistent with the last socket call that was added,
> sys_accept4.
> Some architectures that normally define socket calls (parisc, sh) are missing
> both
> accept4 and recvmmsg, while others that don't have recvmsg now get recvmmsg.
>
> In particular, i386 has recvmmsg now
