On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> ...
> But, why these chosen Makefiles, and not all of them?
I think that inconsistency is untenable. If nothing else, it means your
changes will get broken by other people who also apply constraints
inconsistently.
I think you need to consider what h
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 00:07 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> When a memblock allocation APIs are called with align = 0, the alignment is
> implicitly set to SMP_CACHE_BYTES.
>
> Replace all such uses of memblock APIs with the 'align' parameter explicitly
> set to SMP_CACHE_BYTES and stop implicit ali
> Well it's not really that persuasive. Most people simply let the build
> run to completion, but if you have a problem with a job control 3h
> timelimit, then create a job that kills itself at 2:59 and then
> resubmits itself. That will produce a complete build in 3h chunks
> without any need to
When a memblock allocation APIs are called with align = 0, the alignment is
implicitly set to SMP_CACHE_BYTES.
Replace all such uses of memblock APIs with the 'align' parameter explicitly
set to SMP_CACHE_BYTES and stop implicit alignment assignment in the
memblock internal allocation functions.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:18 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> Now that the 68k Mac port has adopted the via-pmu driver, the same RTC
> code can be shared between m68k and powerpc. Replace duplicated code in
> arch/powerpc and arch/m68k with common RTC accessors for Cuda and PMU.
>
> Drop the problematic WAR
