mac_esp and PIO, was Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

Hi All, At the end of this message is the replacement mac_esp driver I've been working on. It isn't finished but it works fine. The only remaining concerns I have are some of the changes to esp_scsi: firstly I'm hoping that there's a better way to negotiate async transfers, and secondly I'm u

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 01:31:56PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > > Is git smart enough to follow history between files that get removed and > > readded? > > Yes. git revert on the removal changeset will re-add all the files and > try to put the entries back into Kconfig and Makefile. Note that

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 19:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 07:07 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote: > > > On do, 2008-01-03 at 20:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > On Thu

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, Jan 31 2008 at 20:55 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 07:07 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote: >>> On do, 2008-01-03 at 20:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote:

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 07:07 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote: > > On do, 2008-01-03 at 20:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > > > > As recommend

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 07:07 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote: > On do, 2008-01-03 at 20:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > > > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig. There is no use > > > > of F

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On do, 2008-01-03 at 20:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig. There is no use > > > of Fixing these drivers, since there is a much simpler > > > and mod

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote: > From: Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:05:20 +1100 (EST) > > > I have a partially written replacement for mac_esp. Unlike the other > > NCR53C9x drivers it needs PIO or pseudo DMA depending on the machine -- so > > it is not a

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

From: Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:05:20 +1100 (EST) > I have a partially written replacement for mac_esp. Unlike the other > NCR53C9x drivers it needs PIO or pseudo DMA depending on the machine -- so > it is not as straight-forward as jazz_esp. The new esp_scsi core a

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > I totally object to keeping these things around any longer. And this > > I support these changes going in. > > BTW, I hope you do remember why NCR53C9x.[ch] incarnated in the first > place... > > OK, we'll see what we can do... I have a

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > > > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig. There is no use > > > > of Fixing these drivers, since the

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:05:27 +0100 (CET) > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig. There is no use > > > of Fixing these drivers, since there is

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

Hi all, > > Anybody who can look into converting the m68k NCR53C9x drivers and has > > hardware to test (some of) them? I don't think we can afford losing one > > third of our SCSI drivers... I can look into converting some (having worked on the m68k Mac ESP driver in the past - I do recall the M

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 20:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig. There is no use > > > of Fixing these drivers, since there is a much simpler > > > and m

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig. There is no use > > of Fixing these drivers, since there is a much simpler > > and modern esp infrastructure with David Miller's esp_scsi > > > > - Remov

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove of old NCR53C9x/esp family of drivers

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig. There is no use > of Fixing these drivers, since there is a much simpler > and modern esp infrastructure with David Miller's esp_scsi > > - Remove all driver files dependent on NCR53C9x.c > d