Re: [PATCH 2/4] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
Hi Geert, On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 14:54, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Firoz, > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:12 AM Firoz Khan wrote: > > On 18 September 2018 at 15:34, Geert Uytterhoeven > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote: > > >> On 9 August 2018 at 13:00, Geert Uytterhoeven > > >> wrote: > > >> > One first comment below... > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:16 AM Firoz Khan > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k > > >> >> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file. > > >> >> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a > > >> >> system call. > > >> >> > > >> >> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate > > >> >> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file > > >> >> contains the number of system call information. So we have two > > >> >> option to update NR_syscalls value. > > >> >> > > >> >> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the > > >> >>no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill > > >> >>we either add a new system call or delete an existing system > > >> >>call. > > >> >> > > >> >> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll > > >> >>count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file. > > >> >>In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls > > >> >>in asm/unistd.h file. > > >> >> > > >> >> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I moved the > > >> >> NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h to uapi/asm/unistd.h. The macro > > >> >> name also changed form NR_syscalls to __NR_syscalls for making the > > >> >> name convention same across all architecture. While __NR_syscalls > > >> >> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated > > >> >> header to simplifies the implementation. > > >> > > > >> > It can indeed not be part of the UAPI, as UAPI definitions can never > > >> > change, > > >> > while new syscalls will be added in the future, increasing the number > > >> > ;-) > > >> > > >> Thanks for your reply :) > > >> Sorry for the delayed response :( > > >> > > >> I would like to keep __NR_syscalls macro to uapi header in order to > > >> simplify > > >> the system call table generation script. Otherwise the __NR_syscalls > > >> macro need to update manually. That become a problem. > > >> > > >> Please check the below implementation in uapi file make sense? > > >> It is an easy workaround to leave __NR_syscalls macro in > > >> uapi/asm/unistd.h > > >> and enclose it in #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > >> > > >> ... > > >> ... > > >> #define __NR_pwritev2 378 > > >> #define __NR_statx 379 > > >> > > >> #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > >> #define __NR_syscalls 380 > > >> #endif > > >> ... > > >> ... > > > > > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ sounds fine to me. > > > > I posted similar script for 10 different architectures. I got few good > > review > > from the maintainers and it will be applicable for all the > > architectures including > > m68k. There are few area which I identified need to improve. This will take > > couple of days. > > > > But it will be very helpful if you can perform the boot test on the > > actual platform > > and share the result. > > Builds and boots fine on ARAnyM (virtual Atari). Thanks for the support :) > > So for the full series: > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > However, I noticed the following effective difference between the old > arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h and the new generated > arch/m68k/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h: > > -/*#define __NR_break17*/ > -/*#define __NR_stty 31*/ > -/*#define __NR_gtty 32*/ > -/*#define __NR_ftime35*/ > -/*#define __NR_prof 44*/ > -/*#define __NR_lock 53*/ > -/*#define __NR_mpx 56*/ > -/*#define __NR_ulimit 58*/ > -/*#define __NR_oldolduname 59*/ > -/*#define __NR_profil 98*/ > -/*#define __NR_ioperm 101*/ > -/*#define __NR_olduname109*/ > -/*#define __NR_iopl110*/ /* not supported */ > -/*#define __NR_idle112*/ /* Obsolete */ > -/*#define __NR_vm86113*/ /* not supported */ > -/*#define __NR_afs_syscall 137*/ /* Syscall for Andrew File System */ > -/*#define __NR_vserver 278*/ > +#define __NR_break 17 > +#define __NR_stty 31 > +#define __NR_gtty 32 > +#define __NR_ftime 35 > +#define __NR_prof 44 > +#define __NR_lock 53 > +#define __NR_mpx 56 > +#define __NR_ulimit58 > +#define __NR_oldolduname 59 > +#define __NR_profil98 > +#define __NR_ioperm101 > +#define __NR_olduname 109 > +#define __NR_iopl 110 > +#define __NR_idle 112 > +#define __NR_vm86 113 > +#define __NR_afs_syscall 137 > +#define __NR_vserver 278 > > Given userspace code may contain checks for the presence
Re: [PATCH 2/4] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
Hi Firoz,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:12 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
> On 18 September 2018 at 15:34, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
> >> On 9 August 2018 at 13:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > One first comment below...
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
> >> >> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
> >> >> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
> >> >> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
> >> >> system call.
> >> >>
> >> >> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate
> >> >> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file
> >> >> contains the number of system call information. So we have two
> >> >> option to update NR_syscalls value.
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
> >> >>no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
> >> >>we either add a new system call or delete an existing system
> >> >>call.
> >> >>
> >> >> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll
> >> >>count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file.
> >> >>In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls
> >> >>in asm/unistd.h file.
> >> >>
> >> >> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I moved the
> >> >> NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h to uapi/asm/unistd.h. The macro
> >> >> name also changed form NR_syscalls to __NR_syscalls for making the
> >> >> name convention same across all architecture. While __NR_syscalls
> >> >> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated
> >> >> header to simplifies the implementation.
> >> >
> >> > It can indeed not be part of the UAPI, as UAPI definitions can never
> >> > change,
> >> > while new syscalls will be added in the future, increasing the number ;-)
> >>
> >> Thanks for your reply :)
> >> Sorry for the delayed response :(
> >>
> >> I would like to keep __NR_syscalls macro to uapi header in order to
> >> simplify
> >> the system call table generation script. Otherwise the __NR_syscalls
> >> macro need to update manually. That become a problem.
> >>
> >> Please check the below implementation in uapi file make sense?
> >> It is an easy workaround to leave __NR_syscalls macro in uapi/asm/unistd.h
> >> and enclose it in #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >>
> >> ...
> >> ...
> >> #define __NR_pwritev2 378
> >> #define __NR_statx 379
> >>
> >> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >> #define __NR_syscalls 380
> >> #endif
> >> ...
> >> ...
> >
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__ sounds fine to me.
>
> I posted similar script for 10 different architectures. I got few good review
> from the maintainers and it will be applicable for all the
> architectures including
> m68k. There are few area which I identified need to improve. This will take
> couple of days.
>
> But it will be very helpful if you can perform the boot test on the
> actual platform
> and share the result.
Builds and boots fine on ARAnyM (virtual Atari).
So for the full series:
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
However, I noticed the following effective difference between the old
arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h and the new generated
arch/m68k/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h:
-/*#define __NR_break17*/
-/*#define __NR_stty 31*/
-/*#define __NR_gtty 32*/
-/*#define __NR_ftime35*/
-/*#define __NR_prof 44*/
-/*#define __NR_lock 53*/
-/*#define __NR_mpx 56*/
-/*#define __NR_ulimit 58*/
-/*#define __NR_oldolduname 59*/
-/*#define __NR_profil 98*/
-/*#define __NR_ioperm 101*/
-/*#define __NR_olduname109*/
-/*#define __NR_iopl110*/ /* not supported */
-/*#define __NR_idle112*/ /* Obsolete */
-/*#define __NR_vm86113*/ /* not supported */
-/*#define __NR_afs_syscall 137*/ /* Syscall for Andrew File System */
-/*#define __NR_vserver 278*/
+#define __NR_break 17
+#define __NR_stty 31
+#define __NR_gtty 32
+#define __NR_ftime 35
+#define __NR_prof 44
+#define __NR_lock 53
+#define __NR_mpx 56
+#define __NR_ulimit58
+#define __NR_oldolduname 59
+#define __NR_profil98
+#define __NR_ioperm101
+#define __NR_olduname 109
+#define __NR_iopl 110
+#define __NR_idle 112
+#define __NR_vm86 113
+#define __NR_afs_syscall 137
+#define __NR_vserver 278
Given userspace code may contain checks for the presence of these
defines, I think they should not be present.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
Re: [PATCH 2/4] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
Hi Geert,
On 18 September 2018 at 15:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Firoz,
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
>> On 9 August 2018 at 13:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > One first comment below...
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
>> >> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
>> >> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
>> >> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
>> >> system call.
>> >>
>> >> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate
>> >> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file
>> >> contains the number of system call information. So we have two
>> >> option to update NR_syscalls value.
>> >>
>> >> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
>> >>no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
>> >>we either add a new system call or delete an existing system
>> >>call.
>> >>
>> >> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll
>> >>count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file.
>> >>In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls
>> >>in asm/unistd.h file.
>> >>
>> >> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I moved the
>> >> NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h to uapi/asm/unistd.h. The macro
>> >> name also changed form NR_syscalls to __NR_syscalls for making the
>> >> name convention same across all architecture. While __NR_syscalls
>> >> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated
>> >> header to simplifies the implementation.
>> >
>> > It can indeed not be part of the UAPI, as UAPI definitions can never
>> > change,
>> > while new syscalls will be added in the future, increasing the number ;-)
>>
>> Thanks for your reply :)
>> Sorry for the delayed response :(
>>
>> I would like to keep __NR_syscalls macro to uapi header in order to simplify
>> the system call table generation script. Otherwise the __NR_syscalls
>> macro need to update manually. That become a problem.
>>
>> Please check the below implementation in uapi file make sense?
>> It is an easy workaround to leave __NR_syscalls macro in uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> and enclose it in #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>
>> ...
>> ...
>> #define __NR_pwritev2 378
>> #define __NR_statx 379
>>
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> #define __NR_syscalls 380
>> #endif
>> ...
>> ...
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__ sounds fine to me.
I posted similar script for 10 different architectures. I got few good review
from the maintainers and it will be applicable for all the
architectures including
m68k. There are few area which I identified need to improve. This will take
couple of days.
But it will be very helpful if you can perform the boot test on the
actual platform
and share the result.
FYI, Keeping a single script is always our plan for long run. But I
have to keep a
separate versions for the start so each architecture can be handled in one
series. Which would make easier to merge in the initial version. we
could probably
add it to scripts/*.sh first, but that requires more coordination between the
architectures.
- Firoz
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> ge...@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Re: [PATCH 2/4] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
Hi Firoz,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
> On 9 August 2018 at 13:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > One first comment below...
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
> >> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
> >> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
> >> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
> >> system call.
> >>
> >> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate
> >> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file
> >> contains the number of system call information. So we have two
> >> option to update NR_syscalls value.
> >>
> >> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
> >>no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
> >>we either add a new system call or delete an existing system
> >>call.
> >>
> >> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll
> >>count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file.
> >>In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls
> >>in asm/unistd.h file.
> >>
> >> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I moved the
> >> NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h to uapi/asm/unistd.h. The macro
> >> name also changed form NR_syscalls to __NR_syscalls for making the
> >> name convention same across all architecture. While __NR_syscalls
> >> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated
> >> header to simplifies the implementation.
> >
> > It can indeed not be part of the UAPI, as UAPI definitions can never change,
> > while new syscalls will be added in the future, increasing the number ;-)
>
> Thanks for your reply :)
> Sorry for the delayed response :(
>
> I would like to keep __NR_syscalls macro to uapi header in order to simplify
> the system call table generation script. Otherwise the __NR_syscalls
> macro need to update manually. That become a problem.
>
> Please check the below implementation in uapi file make sense?
> It is an easy workaround to leave __NR_syscalls macro in uapi/asm/unistd.h
> and enclose it in #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> ...
> ...
> #define __NR_pwritev2 378
> #define __NR_statx 379
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #define __NR_syscalls 380
> #endif
> ...
> ...
#ifdef __KERNEL__ sounds fine to me.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Re: [PATCH 2/4] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
On 9 August 2018 at 13:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Firoz,
>
> One first comment below...
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
>> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
>> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
>> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
>> system call.
>>
>> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate
>> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file
>> contains the number of system call information. So we have two
>> option to update NR_syscalls value.
>>
>> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
>>no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
>>we either add a new system call or delete an existing system
>>call.
>>
>> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll
>>count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file.
>>In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls
>>in asm/unistd.h file.
>>
>> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I moved the
>> NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h to uapi/asm/unistd.h. The macro
>> name also changed form NR_syscalls to __NR_syscalls for making the
>> name convention same across all architecture. While __NR_syscalls
>> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated
>> header to simplifies the implementation.
>
> It can indeed not be part of the UAPI, as UAPI definitions can never change,
> while new syscalls will be added in the future, increasing the number ;-)
Thanks for your reply :)
Sorry for the delayed response :(
I would like to keep __NR_syscalls macro to uapi header in order to simplify
the system call table generation script. Otherwise the __NR_syscalls
macro need to update manually. That become a problem.
Please check the below implementation in uapi file make sense?
It is an easy workaround to leave __NR_syscalls macro in uapi/asm/unistd.h
and enclose it in #ifdef __KERNEL__
...
...
#define __NR_pwritev2 378
#define __NR_statx 379
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#define __NR_syscalls 380
#endif
...
...
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> ge...@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Re: [PATCH 2/4] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
Hi Firoz,
One first comment below...
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:16 AM Firoz Khan wrote:
> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
> system call.
>
> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate
> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file
> contains the number of system call information. So we have two
> option to update NR_syscalls value.
>
> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
>no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
>we either add a new system call or delete an existing system
>call.
>
> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll
>count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file.
>In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls
>in asm/unistd.h file.
>
> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I moved the
> NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h to uapi/asm/unistd.h. The macro
> name also changed form NR_syscalls to __NR_syscalls for making the
> name convention same across all architecture. While __NR_syscalls
> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated
> header to simplifies the implementation.
It can indeed not be part of the UAPI, as UAPI definitions can never change,
while new syscalls will be added in the future, increasing the number ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
