What to do with videodev.h

2011-01-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, With v4l1 support going completely away, the question is raised what to do with linux/videodev.h . Since v4l1 apps can still use the old API through libv4l1, these apps will still need linux/videodev.h to compile. So I see 3 options: 1) Keep videodev.h in the kernel tree even after

[PATCH 0/2] Fix issues with frame reception from CSI on i.MX31

2011-01-26 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
On some camera systems we do not tolerate the losing of captured frames. We observed losing of the first frame from CSI when double buffering is used (multiple buffers queued by the mx3-camera driver). The patches provide fixes for the observed problem. Anatolij Gustschin (2): v4l: soc-camera:

[PATCH 1/2] v4l: soc-camera: start stream after queueing the buffers

2011-01-26 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Some camera systems have strong requirement for capturing an exact number of frames after starting the stream and do not tolerate losing captured frames. By starting the stream after the videobuf has queued the buffers, we ensure that no frame will be lost. Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin

[PATCH 2/2] dma: ipu_idmac: do not lose valid received data in the irq handler

2011-01-26 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Currently when two or more buffers are queued by the camera driver and so the double buffering is enabled in the idmac, we lose the first frame comming from CSI since it is just dropped by the interrupt handler. The reason for this dropping is that the interrupt handler misleadingly assumes that

[PATCH 1/1] Update stv0900 status when LOCK is missed

2011-01-26 Thread Abylay Ospan
Update stv0900 status when LOCK is missed Signed-off-by: Abylay Ospan aos...@netup.ru --- drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stv0900_core.c |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stv0900_core.c

Re: What to do with videodev.h

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Hans, Em 26-01-2011 06:26, Hans de Goede escreveu: Hi All, With v4l1 support going completely away, the question is raised what to do with linux/videodev.h . Since v4l1 apps can still use the old API through libv4l1, these apps will still need linux/videodev.h to compile. So I see

Re: [PATCH] video/saa7164: Fix sparse warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 25-01-2011 20:54, Peter Hüwe escreveu: Am Dienstag 25 Januar 2011, 23:20:44 schrieb Julia Lawall: On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Peter Huewe wrote: This patch fixes the warning Using plain integer as NULL pointer, generated by sparse, by replacing the offending 0s with NULL. I recall (a number of

Re: Extending rc-core/userspace to handle bigger scancodes - Was: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 25-01-2011 14:55, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:42:57PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 25-01-2011 04:52, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:31:17PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:07:29AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On

Re: DVB driver for TerraTec H7 - how do I install them?

2011-01-26 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Devin Heitmueller dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody? If Terratec provided the driver, any support related questions should be directed to them, not to this list. That

Re: What to do with videodev.h

2011-01-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Hans, Em 26-01-2011 06:26, Hans de Goede escreveu: Hi All, With v4l1 support going completely away, the question is raised what to do with linux/videodev.h . Since v4l1 apps can still use the old API through libv4l1, these apps will still need linux/videodev.h to compile. So I see 3

Re: [RFC PATCH] Getting Hauppauge WinTV HVR-1400 (XC3028L) to work

2011-01-26 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
Hi Mauro! This is problematic, as it seems to be country-specific and/or demod-specific. We'll need to work on a different solution for it. On what Country do you live? By looking at HVR1400 entry, it uses a dibcom 7000p demod. We need to know what are country/demod for the users for whose

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Dmitry, Em 26-01-2011 00:00, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:22:09PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 05:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 25-01-2011 18:54, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: On Wed, Jan

Re: What to do with videodev.h

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 26-01-2011 07:47, Hans Verkuil escreveu: Hi Hans, Em 26-01-2011 06:26, Hans de Goede escreveu: Hi All, With v4l1 support going completely away, the question is raised what to do with linux/videodev.h . Since v4l1 apps can still use the old API through libv4l1, these apps will still

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, Btw, I took some time to take analyse the input-kbd stuff. As said at the README: This is a small collection of input layer utilities. I wrote them mainly for testing and debugging, but maybe others find them useful too :-) ... Gerd

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 26-01-2011 11:08, Gerd Hoffmann escreveu: Hi, Btw, I took some time to take analyse the input-kbd stuff. As said at the README: This is a small collection of input layer utilities. I wrote them mainly for testing and debugging, but maybe others find them useful too :-)

Re: What to do with videodev.h

2011-01-26 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com wrote: We should touch the tools that we care of. Maybe Devin could change tvtime, we should remove V4L1 driver from xawtv3/xawtv4. Yeah, I have some tvtime work planned, and dropping v4l1 was definitely on the list. I

Re: Is media_build download broken?

2011-01-26 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:11 AM, VDR User wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote: I'm getting the following now: git pull ssh://linuxtv.org/git/media_build master Permission denied (publickey). Works here just fine. Looks like your ssh key setup is

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, Hmm, doesn't apply cleanly ... I suspect that Dmitry did the patch against the Debian package, based on a 2007 version of it, as it seems that Debian is using an older version of the package. Applied, thanks. cheers, Gerd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 06:26 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: .. However, as said previously in this thread, input-kbd won't work with any RC table that uses NEC extended (and there are several devices on the current Kernels with those tables), since it only reads up to 16 bits. ir-keytable works with

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:22:09PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 05:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 25-01-2011 18:54, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: .. That has been done as

Re: Is media_build download broken?

2011-01-26 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote: Seems that an explicit 'pull over ssh' command was recently added to media_build, which only works if you've got a shell account on linuxtv.org. I'll ask Mauro about it and/or just fix it. He should just have to do git://

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:22:09PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 05:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 26-01-2011 11:08, Gerd Hoffmann escreveu: Hi, Btw, I took some time to take analyse the input-kbd stuff. As said at the README: This is a small collection of input layer utilities. I wrote them

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: diff --git a/input.c b/input.c index d57a31e..a9bd5e8 100644 --- a/input.c +++ b/input.c @@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ int device_open(int nr, int verbose) close(fd); return -1; } - if

[GIT PULL] More IR fixes for 2.6.38

2011-01-26 Thread Jarod Wilson
Mauro, Please pull these additional IR driver fixes against Linus' tree in for 2.6.38 merge. Without these, mceusb is still broken (keybounce issues), the HD-PVR tx won't work, and ir-kbd-i2c behaves badly with both the HD-PVR and the HVR-1950. Thanks much! The following changes since commit

Re: [GIT PULL] More IR fixes for 2.6.38

2011-01-26 Thread Andy Walls
Mauro, I plan to make extensive lirc_zilog changes starting tonight, so the sooner Jarrod's lirc_zilog.c fix is in a media_tree branch, the less rebase I'll have to do. :) Thanks. Andy Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com wrote: Mauro, Please pull these additional IR driver fixes against Linus'

Re: DVB driver for TerraTec H7 - how do I install them?

2011-01-26 Thread Bjørn Mork
Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com writes: That is the point: TerraTec states that these are third-party drivers, and they provide no support (as far as we can't give you a better answer). So I am just trying to find out where those drivers came from, and if somebody has any experience / a

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 26-01-2011 12:58, Mark Lord escreveu: On 11-01-26 06:26 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: .. However, as said previously in this thread, input-kbd won't work with any RC table that uses NEC extended (and there are several devices on the current Kernels with those tables), since it only

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:41:01PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 26-01-2011 12:58, Mark Lord escreveu: On 11-01-26 06:26 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: .. However, as said previously in this thread, input-kbd won't work with any RC table that uses NEC extended (and there are

Re: [GIT PULL] More IR fixes for 2.6.38

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 26-01-2011 15:23, Andy Walls escreveu: Mauro, I plan to make extensive lirc_zilog changes starting tonight, so the sooner Jarrod's lirc_zilog.c fix is in a media_tree branch, the less rebase I'll have to do. :) Andy, Then, it is better to use Jarod's tree for it. His patches are

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 26-01-2011 13:05, Mark Lord escreveu: On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:22:09PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 05:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 25-01-2011 18:54, Dmitry

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 26-01-2011 14:51, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: diff --git a/input.c b/input.c index d57a31e..a9bd5e8 100644 --- a/input.c +++ b/input.c @@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ int device_open(int nr, int verbose) close(fd);

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:29:09PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 26-01-2011 14:51, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: diff --git a/input.c b/input.c index d57a31e..a9bd5e8 100644 --- a/input.c +++ b/input.c @@

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, The check should be against concrete version (0x1 in this case). Stepping back: what does the version mean? 0x1 == 1.0 ? 0x10001 == 1.1 ? Can I expect the interface stay backward compatible if only the minor revision changes, i.e. makes it sense to accept 1.x? Will the

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 01:24 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:29:09PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 26-01-2011 14:51, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: diff --git a/input.c b/input.c index d57a31e..a9bd5e8

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 02:16 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, The check should be against concrete version (0x1 in this case). Stepping back: what does the version mean? 0x1 == 1.0 ? 0x10001 == 1.1 ? Can I expect the interface stay backward compatible if only the minor revision changes,

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 26-01-2011 17:16, Gerd Hoffmann escreveu: Hi, The check should be against concrete version (0x1 in this case). Dmitry, Ok, now I see what you're meaning. Yeah, an absolute version check like what you've proposed is better than a relative version check. Stepping back: what does

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 12:59 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:41:01PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 26-01-2011 12:58, Mark Lord escreveu: On 11-01-26 06:26 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: .. However, as said previously in this thread, input-kbd won't work with any RC

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 11:44 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: .. Nope. Does not work here: $ lsinput protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537) It would be much more helpful if you tried to test what has been fixed (hint: version

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:16:09PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:Hi, The check should be against concrete version (0x1 in this case). Stepping back: what does the version mean? Nothing, it is just a number. 0x1 == 1.0 ? 0x10001 == 1.1 ? No, not really. Can I expect the

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 12:32 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 26-01-2011 13:05, Mark Lord escreveu: .. Nope. Does not work here: $ lsinput protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537) You need to relax the version test at the tree. As I said before, this is a development tool from the

omap3-isp segfault

2011-01-26 Thread Neil MacMunn
Hello, When I modprobe omap3-isp I get a segfault. I'm attempting to use a Gumstix Overo with Micron MT9V032. root@overo:~# modprobe omap3-isp Linux media interface: v0.10 Linux video capture interface: v2.00 omap3isp omap3isp: Revision 2.0 found Unable to handle kernel NULL

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:31:44PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 11:44 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: .. Nope. Does not work here: $ lsinput protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537) It would be much more

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:33:17PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 12:32 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 26-01-2011 13:05, Mark Lord escreveu: .. Nope. Does not work here: $ lsinput protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537) You need to relax the version test at

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 02:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: I do not consider lsinput refusing to work a regression. Obviously, since you don't use that tool. Those of us who do use it see this as broken userspace compatibility. Who the hell reviews this crap, anyway? Code like that should never have made it

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:47:18PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 02:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: I do not consider lsinput refusing to work a regression. Obviously, since you don't use that tool. Those of us who do use it see this as broken userspace compatibility. Who the hell

Re: Is media_build download broken?

2011-01-26 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote: Seems that an explicit 'pull over ssh' command was recently added to media_build, which only works if you've got a shell account on linuxtv.org. I'll ask Mauro about

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, It depends. We do not have a clear way to see if new ioctls are supported (and I do not consider try new ioctl and see if data sticks being a good way) so that facilitated protocol version rev-up. Yea, EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2 on a old kernel returns EINVAL. Not good. There is another one

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, Will the major revision ever change? Does it make sense to check the version at all? As already established earlier in this thread, by Linus Torvalds as well as by myself, NO! Check removed. thanks, Gerd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in

Re: DVB driver for TerraTec H7 - how do I install them?

2011-01-26 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi, On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote: Sure is.  But even if you get past the build errors, you'll soon discover that Terratec forgot to include the necessary firmware as well.  You can find it and some other hints in this thread:

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 02:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:47:18PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 02:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: I do not consider lsinput refusing to work a regression. Obviously, since you don't use that tool. Those of us who do use it see this as

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
Or perhaps get rid of that unworkable version number thing (just freeze it in time with the 2.6.35 value returned), and implement a get_feature_flags ioctl or something for going forward. Then you can just turn on new bits in the flags as new features are added. It's a kludge (to get around the

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:41:07PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 02:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:47:18PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 02:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: I do not consider lsinput refusing to work a regression. Obviously, since you

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:49:14PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: Or perhaps get rid of that unworkable version number thing (just freeze it in time with the 2.6.35 value returned), and implement a get_feature_flags ioctl or something for going forward. Then you can just turn on new bits in the flags

Re: [GIT PULL] More IR fixes for 2.6.38

2011-01-26 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:44 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Andy, Then, it is better to use Jarod's tree for it. His patches are against upstream, and are meant to be applied to .38. So, I need first to send them to linux-next, then to upstream and then merge from upstream, otherwise,

Re: [RFC] ISP lane shifter support

2011-01-26 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Michael, On Tuesday 25 January 2011 10:10:50 Michael Jones wrote: On 01/24/2011 08:45 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Monday 24 January 2011 15:16:28 Michael Jones wrote: On 01/24/2011 02:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: snip As

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: .. I wonder if the patch below is all that is needed... Nope. Does not work here: $ lsinput protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537) Heh.. I just noticed something *new* in the bootlogs on my

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 08:01 PM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: .. I wonder if the patch below is all that is needed... Nope. Does not work here: $ lsinput protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537) Heh.. I just

Re: omap3-isp segfault

2011-01-26 Thread Neil MacMunn
Ok I solved the segfault problem by updating some of my v4l2 files (specifically v4l2-common.c). Now I only get nice sounding console messages. Linux media interface: v0.10 Linux video capture interface: v2.00 omap3isp omap3isp: Revision 2.0 found omap-iommu omap-iommu.0: isp:

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:07:29PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 08:01 PM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: .. I wonder if the patch below is all that is needed... Nope. Does not work here: $ lsinput

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Lord
On 11-01-26 09:12 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:07:29PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 08:01 PM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: .. I wonder if the patch below is all that is needed... Nope.

Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?

2011-01-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:18:53PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 09:12 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:07:29PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 08:01 PM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote: On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: